TLRY vs. CURLF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tilray, Inc. (TLRY) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF).

Performance

TLRY vs. CURLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tilray, Inc. (TLRY) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TLRY vs. CURLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TLRY Tilray, Inc.	-28.35%	-32.11%	-42.17%	-14.50%	-61.74%	-14.89%	-51.78%	-75.72%	-22.21%
CURLF Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.	-15.08%	61.54%	-61.58%	-5.52%	-52.25%	-24.82%	89.73%	33.12%	-18.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TLRY : $713.92M CURLF : $1.65B
EPS TLRY : -$27.99 CURLF : -$0.30
PS Ratio TLRY : 0.63 CURLF : 1.27
Total Revenue (TTM) TLRY : $1.08B CURLF : $1.29B
Gross Profit (TTM) TLRY : $304.37M CURLF : $526.37M
EBITDA (TTM) TLRY : -$2.92B CURLF : $217.96M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLRY achieves a -28.35% return, which is significantly lower than CURLF's -15.08% return.

TLRY

• 1D: 8.01%
• 1M: -17.79%
• YTD: -28.35%
• 6M: -62.60%
• 1Y: -1.60%
• 3Y*: -36.53%
• 5Y*: -50.75%
• 10Y*: —

CURLF

• 1D: 13.23%
• 1M: -8.15%
• YTD: -15.08%
• 6M: -23.30%
• 1Y: 135.16%
• 3Y*: -8.68%
• 5Y*: -32.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TLRY vs. CURLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLRY

TLRY Risk / Return Rank: 48
TLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
TLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
TLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
TLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

CURLF

CURLF Risk / Return Rank: 77
CURLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
CURLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CURLF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CURLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CURLF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLRY vs. CURLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tilray, Inc. (TLRY) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLRY	CURLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	1.10	-1.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	2.24	-1.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.27	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	1.91	-1.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.06	3.80	-3.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLRY vs. CURLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLRY Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the CURLF Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLRY and CURLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLRY	CURLF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	1.10	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.53	-0.38	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	-0.15	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between TLRY and CURLF is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TLRY vs. CURLF - Dividend Comparison

Neither TLRY nor CURLF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TLRY vs. CURLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLRY drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, roughly equal to the maximum CURLF drawdown of -95.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLRY and CURLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLRY	CURLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.83%	-95.70%	-4.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.48%	-59.79%	-11.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.39%	-95.16%	-3.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.70%	-87.49%	-12.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-91.21%	-57.72%	-33.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.25%	30.01%	+12.24%

Volatility

TLRY vs. CURLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tilray, Inc. (TLRY) is 17.00%, while Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) has a volatility of 22.79%. This indicates that TLRY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CURLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLRY	CURLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.00%	22.79%	-5.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.29%	83.75%	-9.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	134.40%	124.40%	+10.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.79%	85.28%	+10.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	112.90%	83.15%	+29.75%

Financials

TLRY vs. CURLF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tilray, Inc. and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TLRY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tilray, Inc. reported a gross profit of 57.50M and revenue of 217.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.4%.

CURLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 128.35M and revenue of 338.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.0%.

TLRY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tilray, Inc. reported an operating income of -22.28M and revenue of 217.51M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.2%.

CURLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.96M and revenue of 338.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.

TLRY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tilray, Inc. reported a net income of -43.51M and revenue of 217.51M, resulting in a net margin of -20.0%.

CURLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -60.74M and revenue of 338.19M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.