MJ vs. QQQS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MJ (ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF) and QQQS (Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - MJ tracks the Prime Alternative Harvest Index while QQQS tracks the Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MJ returned -7.86%/yr vs 15.89%/yr for QQQS. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MJ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQQS.

Performance

MJ vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MJ achieves a -14.07% return, which is significantly lower than QQQS's 27.27% return.

MJ

• 1D: -3.25%
• 1M: -5.09%
• YTD: -14.07%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 40.95%
• 3Y*: -7.86%
• 5Y*: -35.31%
• 10Y*: —

QQQS

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 27.27%
• 6M: 27.40%
• 1Y: 79.99%
• 3Y*: 15.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJ vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF	-14.07%	13.07%	-23.97%	-24.18%	-12.16%
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	27.27%	23.03%	10.20%	-1.94%	6.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MJ and QQQS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022	0.48

MJ vs. QQQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MJ	QQQS
Healthcare	76.5%	41.0%
Consumer Defensive	18.6%	1.4%
Real Estate	3.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.9%	5.2%
Technology	0.6%	42.1%
Financial Services	0.3%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	2.4%
Energy	-	2.2%
Industrials	-	4.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MJ vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJ

MJ Risk / Return Rank: 21
MJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MJ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
MJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MJ Martin Ratio Rank: 16

QQQS

QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 85
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJ vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MJ	QQQS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	3.00	-2.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	3.78	-2.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.44	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	5.90	-5.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.52	19.70	-18.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MJ vs. QQQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the QQQS Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MJ and QQQS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MJ	QQQS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	3.00	-2.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.48	0.63	-1.11

Drawdowns

MJ vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, which is greater than QQQS's maximum drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJ and QQQS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MJ	QQQS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.55%	-38.06%	-58.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.66%	-13.63%	-35.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.73%	-34.32%	-35.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.45%	-2.55%	-91.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.20%	-13.26%	-55.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.08%	4.07%	+23.01%

Volatility

MJ vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) has a higher volatility of 11.92% compared to Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) at 7.39%. This indicates that MJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MJ	QQQS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.92%	7.39%	+4.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.46%	18.49%	+40.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	86.70%	26.90%	+59.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.89%	28.34%	+31.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.74%	28.34%	+27.40%

MJ vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

MJ vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison

MJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than QQQS's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF	2.31%	1.98%	13.80%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	2.73%	3.48%	0.80%	0.68%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MJ and QQQS in my portfolio?

MJ and QQQS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MJ or QQQS?

MJ has higher volatility (11.92%) compared to QQQS (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MJ dropped -96.55% vs QQQS's -38.06%.

Which ETF is better, MJ or QQQS?

On 3-year performance, QQQS leads with 15.89% vs -7.86% for MJ. On fees, QQQS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQQS has been the lower-risk option at 7.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MJ or QQQS?

Over the 3-year period, QQQS has performed better with a 15.89% return vs -7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MJ or QQQS?

QQQS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MJ or QQQS?

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 2.31% for MJ.

What is the main difference between MJ and QQQS?

MJ tracks Prime Alternative Harvest Index, while QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MJ and 0.20% for QQQS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.