PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBOAX vs. MIIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBOAX vs. MIIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Core Bond Fund (MBOAX) and Madison High Quality Bond Fund (MIIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBOAX achieves a -0.68% return, which is significantly lower than MIIBX's 0.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MBOAX having a 1.36% annualized return and MIIBX not far behind at 1.34%.


MBOAX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.99%
6M
-0.93%
YTD
-0.68%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
-0.47%
10Y*
1.36%
ALL TIME*
3.00%

MIIBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
6M
-0.06%
YTD
0.03%
1Y
1.80%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
1.34%
ALL TIME*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MBOAX vs. MIIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBOAX
Madison Core Bond Fund
-0.68%6.96%1.14%5.63%-12.82%-1.85%9.22%8.31%-0.98%3.02%
MIIBX
Madison High Quality Bond Fund
0.03%6.21%2.74%4.55%-7.13%-1.76%4.50%4.54%0.91%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MBOAX and MIIBX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2000

0.86

The correlation between MBOAX and MIIBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBOAX vs. MIIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MBOAX
MBOAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MBOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MBOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

MIIBX
MIIBX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MIIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MIIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MBOAX vs. MIIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Core Bond Fund (MBOAX) and Madison High Quality Bond Fund (MIIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MBOAXMIIBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.47

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

3.61

-1.36

MBOAX vs. MIIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBOAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the MIIBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBOAX and MIIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBOAX vs. MIIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBOAX drawdown since its inception was -17.78%, which is greater than MIIBX's maximum drawdown of -11.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBOAX and MIIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBOAXMIIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.78%

-11.12%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-1.70%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.07%

-2.33%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.55%

-10.69%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.78%

-11.12%

-6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-1.09%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-1.25%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.69%

+0.48%

Volatility

MBOAX vs. MIIBX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Core Bond Fund (MBOAX) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to Madison High Quality Bond Fund (MIIBX) at 0.59%. This indicates that MBOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBOAXMIIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

0.59%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

1.76%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71%

2.26%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

3.54%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

2.78%

+1.88%

MBOAX vs. MIIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBOAX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MIIBX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBOAX vs. MIIBX - Dividend Comparison

MBOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than MIIBX's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBOAX
Madison Core Bond Fund
3.26%3.39%3.27%2.73%1.88%1.85%3.77%2.42%2.48%2.28%2.72%4.60%
MIIBX
Madison High Quality Bond Fund
3.56%3.34%3.02%2.17%1.23%1.54%1.28%1.87%1.73%1.41%1.23%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBOAX and MIIBX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBOAX has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to MIIBX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBOAX dropped -17.78% vs MIIBX's -11.12%.

MIIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBOAX and MIIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer