MINT vs. KBA
MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) and KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while KBA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Index. MINT is actively managed, while KBA is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MINT returned 2.70%/yr vs 10.15%/yr for KBA. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MINT charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KBA.
Performance
MINT vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINT achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's 12.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MINT has underperformed KBA with an annualized return of 2.70%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.15% annualized return.
MINT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 2.70%
KBA
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 12.62%
- 6M
- 16.80%
- 1Y
- 49.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
MINT vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.81% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 12.62% | 33.88% | 15.73% | -16.77% | -3.49% | 3.17% | 41.62% | 35.44% | -26.28% | 30.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINT and KBA is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014 | 0.02 |
The correlation between MINT and KBA shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINT vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank
MINT
KBA
MINT vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINT | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +14.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +61.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 20.53 | 1.50 | +19.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 94.30 | 6.45 | +87.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 939.26 | 17.29 | +921.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINT | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09 | 2.80 | +14.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 5.99 | 0.24 | +5.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.87 | 0.40 | +2.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.47 | 0.35 | +2.11 |
Drawdowns
MINT vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINT drawdown since its inception was -4.62%, smaller than the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT and KBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINT | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -53.24% | +48.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.05% | -7.65% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.16% | -31.23% | +31.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.42% | -39.95% | +37.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.62% | -45.32% | +40.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.25% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -25.81% | +25.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 2.85% | -2.85% |
Volatility
MINT vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) is 0.09%, while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that MINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINT | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 7.29% | -7.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.20% | 12.44% | -12.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27% | 17.65% | -17.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.58% | 27.20% | -26.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 25.32% | -24.37% |
MINT vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINT has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINT vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than KBA's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.39% | 1.56% | 2.18% | 2.34% | 49.05% | 9.07% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.46% | 6.62% | 29.08% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MINT and KBA have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBA has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINT dropped -4.62% vs KBA's -53.24%.
On 10-year performance, KBA leads with 10.15% vs 2.70% for MINT. On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, KBA has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 2.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KBA.
MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 1.39% for KBA.
MINT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while KBA is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for MINT and 0.60% for KBA.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.09 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MINT and KBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer