MIN vs. VOO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MIN (MFS Intermediate Income Trust) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, MIN returned 2.87%/yr vs 15.16%/yr for VOO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MIN vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIN achieves a -1.38% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MIN has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.87%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.16% annualized return.

MIN

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: -2.87%
• YTD: -1.38%
• 1Y: 0.35%
• 3Y*: 5.56%
• 5Y*: 0.75%
• 10Y*: 2.87%

VOO

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 1.25%
• 6M: 8.34%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 1Y: 21.53%
• 3Y*: 20.16%
• 5Y*: 13.01%
• 10Y*: 15.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIN vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MIN MFS Intermediate Income Trust	-1.38%	6.92%	8.59%	6.33%	-15.68%	2.79%	9.71%	13.42%	-2.99%	2.36%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.45%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MIN and VOO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010	0.12

Return for Risk

MIN vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIN

MIN Risk / Return Rank: 43
MIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
MIN Omega Ratio Rank: 37
MIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MIN Martin Ratio Rank: 47

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 66
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIN vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIN	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	1.73	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	2.39	-2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.31	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.06	2.43	-2.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.13	10.60	-10.47

MIN vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIN and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIN vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIN drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIN and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIN	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.15%	-33.99%	+2.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.20%	-8.90%	+2.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.08%	-18.69%	+11.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.31%	-24.52%	+5.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.31%	-33.99%	+14.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.23%	-1.11%	-2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.83%	-3.68%	-5.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	2.04%	+0.74%

Volatility

MIN vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) is 1.90%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that MIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIN	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.90%	4.16%	-2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	9.97%	-1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.78%	12.53%	-1.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.19%	16.93%	-5.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.40%	18.00%	-7.60%

Dividends

MIN vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MIN MFS Intermediate Income Trust	9.38%	8.78%	9.11%	9.36%	10.04%	8.97%	8.90%	9.04%	9.70%	9.37%	9.39%	9.71%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.07%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIN and VOO in my portfolio?

MIN and VOO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MIN or VOO?

VOO has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to MIN (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIN dropped -31.15% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.