MIN vs. FLIN

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MIN (MFS Intermediate Income Trust) is a stock, while FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) is India Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, MIN returned 0.34%/yr vs 4.67%/yr for FLIN. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

MIN vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIN achieves a -2.58% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -7.54% return.

MIN

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -1.62%
• 6M: -3.67%
• YTD: -2.58%
• 1Y: -1.59%
• 3Y*: 4.35%
• 5Y*: 0.34%
• 10Y*: 2.62%
• ALL TIME*: 2.55%

FLIN

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: -3.67%
• YTD: -7.54%
• 1Y: -5.26%
• 3Y*: 5.08%
• 5Y*: 4.67%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	$22.41M	$27.89M	$27.53M
MIN MFS Intermediate Income Trust	$396.17K	$388.03K	$434.87K

MIN vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MIN MFS Intermediate Income Trust	-2.58%	6.92%	8.59%	6.33%	-15.68%	2.79%	9.71%	13.42%	0.14%
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	-7.54%	2.40%	10.33%	20.58%	-7.96%	24.96%	14.50%	4.77%	-7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MIN and FLIN is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018	0.11

Return for Risk

MIN vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIN

MIN Risk / Return Rank: 32
MIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MIN Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
MIN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FLIN

FLIN Risk / Return Rank: 6
FLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIN vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIN	FLIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	-0.33	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	-0.38	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	0.96	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	-0.28	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	-0.62	-0.05

MIN vs. FLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is higher than the FLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIN and FLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIN vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIN drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, smaller than the maximum FLIN drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIN and FLIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIN	FLIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.15%	-41.90%	+10.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.20%	-18.25%	+12.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.08%	-22.85%	+15.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.31%	-22.85%	+3.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.42%	-14.88%	+10.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.83%	-8.16%	-0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	8.17%	-5.24%

Volatility

MIN vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) is 2.76%, while Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that MIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIN	FLIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	4.09%	-1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.81%	13.21%	-4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.85%	15.36%	-4.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.21%	15.83%	-4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.41%	20.35%	-9.94%

Dividends

MIN vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison

MIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than FLIN's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	0.43%	0.56%	1.58%	0.73%	0.73%	2.26%	0.68%	0.90%	0.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MIN MFS Intermediate Income Trust	9.59%	8.78%	9.11%	9.36%	10.04%	8.97%	8.90%	9.04%	9.70%	9.37%	9.39%	9.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIN and FLIN in my portfolio?

MIN and FLIN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MIN or FLIN?

FLIN has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to MIN (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIN dropped -31.15% vs FLIN's -41.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.