PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MIN vs. CLOZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MIN and CLOZ is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.0

Performance

MIN vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.16%
5.91%
MIN
CLOZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MIN:

0.08

CLOZ:

6.88

Sortino Ratio

MIN:

0.18

CLOZ:

9.64

Omega Ratio

MIN:

1.02

CLOZ:

3.70

Calmar Ratio

MIN:

0.05

CLOZ:

8.52

Martin Ratio

MIN:

0.27

CLOZ:

54.47

Ulcer Index

MIN:

2.87%

CLOZ:

0.22%

Daily Std Dev

MIN:

9.78%

CLOZ:

1.72%

Max Drawdown

MIN:

-40.63%

CLOZ:

-2.70%

Current Drawdown

MIN:

-9.87%

CLOZ:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIN achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 1.44% return.


MIN

YTD

0.75%

1M

1.52%

6M

0.16%

1Y

2.25%

5Y*

-0.74%

10Y*

1.52%

CLOZ

YTD

1.44%

1M

0.88%

6M

5.91%

1Y

11.72%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MIN vs. CLOZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MIN is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MIN is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MIN is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MIN is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MIN is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MIN is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MIN vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MIN, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.086.88
The chart of Sortino ratio for MIN, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.189.64
The chart of Omega ratio for MIN, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.023.70
The chart of Calmar ratio for MIN, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.108.52
The chart of Martin ratio for MIN, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.2754.47
MIN
CLOZ

The current MIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 6.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIN and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.08
6.88
MIN
CLOZ

Dividends

MIN vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

MIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than CLOZ's 8.78% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MIN
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
4.45%5.45%7.50%8.82%6.18%6.48%6.52%9.70%9.37%9.39%9.71%9.92%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
8.78%9.09%8.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MIN vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIN drawdown since its inception was -40.63%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -2.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIN and CLOZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-2.35%
0
MIN
CLOZ

Volatility

MIN vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.22%. This indicates that MIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.62%
0.22%
MIN
CLOZ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab