PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIH.F vs. RR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MIH.F vs. RR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MIH.F) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MIH.F is traded in EUR, while RR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RR.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIH.F achieves a -5.55% return, which is significantly lower than RR.L's 15.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MIH.F having a 19.27% annualized return and RR.L not far ahead at 19.97%.


MIH.F

1D
4.87%
1M
-8.52%
YTD
-5.55%
6M
-9.38%
1Y
-4.58%
3Y*
69.42%
5Y*
49.21%
10Y*
19.27%

RR.L

1D
4.32%
1M
15.98%
YTD
15.47%
6M
21.86%
1Y
49.56%
3Y*
106.06%
5Y*
63.84%
10Y*
19.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIH.F vs. RR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIH.F
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
-5.55%53.66%160.27%44.65%82.05%-17.87%-29.30%12.57%0.40%-28.00%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
15.47%94.10%98.88%228.38%-28.06%17.64%-55.13%-11.21%-1.85%22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MIH.F and RR.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2007

0.12

The correlation between MIH.F and RR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (10 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIH.F vs. RR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIH.F
MIH.F Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MIH.F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIH.F Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIH.F Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MIH.F Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIH.F Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

RR.L
RR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIH.F vs. RR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MIH.F) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIH.FRR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.23

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

2.47

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

6.73

-7.08

MIH.F vs. RR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIH.F Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the RR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIH.F and RR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIH.F vs. RR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIH.F drawdown since its inception was -87.77%, roughly equal to the maximum RR.L drawdown of -91.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIH.F and RR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIH.FRR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.77%

-91.10%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.74%

-18.74%

-14.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.74%

-23.57%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.74%

-56.76%

+24.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.77%

-89.60%

+26.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.52%

-2.90%

-25.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.89%

-31.91%

-35.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.42%

6.89%

+4.53%

Volatility

MIH.F vs. RR.L - Volatility Comparison

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MIH.F) has a higher volatility of 15.53% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) at 11.90%. This indicates that MIH.F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIH.FRR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.53%

11.90%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.99%

31.49%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.61%

36.77%

+8.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.53%

42.68%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.84%

49.47%

-10.63%

Dividends

MIH.F vs. RR.L - Dividend Comparison

MIH.F has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIH.F
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.03%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.01%0.01%0.01%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
0.73%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.71%1.41%0.54%1.75%4.06%

Financials

MIH.F vs. RR.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MIH.F values in EUR, RR.L values in GBP

Frequently Asked Questions


MIH.F and RR.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIH.F and RR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer