MIH.F vs. TM
Compare and contrast key facts about Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MIH.F) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM).
Performance
MIH.F vs. TM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIH.F vs. TM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIH.F Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 18.04% | 53.66% | 160.27% | 44.65% | 82.05% | -17.87% | -29.30% | 12.57% | 0.40% | -28.00% |
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | -0.54% | 0.31% | 16.07% | 34.08% | -19.75% | 32.42% | 4.26% | 25.47% | -1.39% | -1.68% |
Different Trading Currencies
MIH.F is traded in EUR, while TM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIH.F achieves a 18.04% return, which is significantly higher than TM's -0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MIH.F has outperformed TM with an annualized return of 23.28%, while TM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.04% annualized return.
MIH.F
- 1D
- 6.36%
- 1M
- -10.05%
- YTD
- 18.04%
- 6M
- 16.72%
- 1Y
- 61.94%
- 3Y*
- 96.20%
- 5Y*
- 56.91%
- 10Y*
- 23.28%
TM
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -13.04%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- 1Y
- 13.82%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIH.F vs. TM — Risk / Return Rank
MIH.F
TM
MIH.F vs. TM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MIH.F) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIH.F | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 0.44 | +0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 0.90 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.11 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 0.73 | +1.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | 1.76 | +5.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIH.F | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.44 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | 0.36 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.42 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.25 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIH.F and TM is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MIH.F vs. TM - Dividend Comparison
MIH.F has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIH.F Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | 1.37% | 2.95% | 2.81% | 2.45% | 2.90% | 2.45% | 2.74% | 1.30% | 3.40% | 2.96% | 3.23% | 5.59% |
Drawdowns
MIH.F vs. TM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIH.F drawdown since its inception was -87.77%, which is greater than TM's maximum drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIH.F and TM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIH.F | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.77% | -60.15% | -27.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.26% | -18.26% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.93% | -36.80% | +8.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.77% | -36.80% | -25.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.67% | -15.55% | +4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.21% | -20.99% | -47.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.75% | 6.66% | +2.09% |
Volatility
MIH.F vs. TM - Volatility Comparison
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MIH.F) has a higher volatility of 13.37% compared to Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) at 6.96%. This indicates that MIH.F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIH.F | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.37% | 6.96% | +6.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.20% | 19.27% | +14.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.74% | 31.70% | +15.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.16% | 26.00% | +18.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.86% | 23.69% | +15.17% |
Financials
MIH.F vs. TM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Toyota Motor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities