MIGO vs. ROBO
MIGO (MIG Core ETF) and ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MIGO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while ROBO is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. MIGO is actively managed, while ROBO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ROBO.
Performance
MIGO vs. ROBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MIGO
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROBO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- YTD
- 19.69%
- 1Y
- 37.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
MIGO vs. ROBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MIGO MIG Core ETF | 22.06% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIGO and ROBO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIGO vs. ROBO — Risk / Return Rank
MIGO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROBO
MIGO vs. ROBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MIG Core ETF (MIGO) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIGO | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIGO vs. ROBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIGO drawdown since its inception was -13.39%, smaller than the maximum ROBO drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGO and ROBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIGO | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.39% | -43.65% | +30.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -8.17% | +6.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -12.88% | +10.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.94% | — |
Volatility
MIGO vs. ROBO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIGO | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.48% | 25.89% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 24.28% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 23.38% | +2.10% |
MIGO vs. ROBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIGO vs. ROBO - Dividend Comparison
MIGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIGO MIG Core ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, MIGO and ROBO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MIGO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIGO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.
ROBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for MIGO.
MIGO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ROBO is Robotics. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MIGO and 0.95% for ROBO.
Find the right allocation for MIGO and ROBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer