MIGO vs. BITQ
MIGO (MIG Core ETF) and BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MIGO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while BITQ is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index. MIGO is actively managed, while BITQ is passively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MIGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BITQ.
Performance
MIGO vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MIGO
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BITQ
- 1D
- -3.47%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 20.58%
- 3Y*
- 33.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.41M | $2.10M | $3.18M | |
MIGO MIG Core ETF | $37.24K | $187.37K | $376.73K |
MIGO vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MIGO MIG Core ETF | 16.85% |
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 20.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIGO and BITQ is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIGO vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank
MIGO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITQ
MIGO vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MIG Core ETF (MIGO) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIGO | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIGO vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIGO drawdown since its inception was -13.39%, smaller than the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGO and BITQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIGO | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.39% | -90.32% | +76.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -29.70% | +23.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -51.99% | +48.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.41% | — |
Volatility
MIGO vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIGO | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 44.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.54% | 59.30% | -33.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.54% | 67.22% | -41.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.54% | 67.16% | -41.62% |
MIGO vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIGO vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither MIGO nor BITQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 3.12% |
MIGO MIG Core ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIGO and BITQ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MIGO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIGO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.
MIGO and BITQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MIGO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BITQ is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MIGO and 0.85% for BITQ.
Find the right allocation for MIGO and BITQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer