MIGO vs. SCHX
MIGO (MIG Core ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MIGO is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
MIGO vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MIGO
- 1D
- -4.64%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
MIGO vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MIGO MIG Core ETF | 15.28% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIGO and SCHX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIGO vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
MIGO
SCHX
MIGO vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MIG Core ETF (MIGO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIGO | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.58 | 0.84 | +1.74 |
Drawdowns
MIGO vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIGO drawdown since its inception was -13.39%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGO and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIGO | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.39% | -34.33% | +20.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.14% | -2.91% | -3.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -3.97% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
MIGO vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIGO | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.17% | 12.29% | +12.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 17.16% | +8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 18.16% | +7.01% |
MIGO vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIGO vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
MIGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIGO MIG Core ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, MIGO and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MIGO.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for MIGO.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MIGO and 0.03% for SCHX.
Find the right allocation for MIGO and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer