PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDU vs. INTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 42.23% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 871.59% return.


MIDU

1D
1.17%
1M
10.15%
YTD
42.23%
6M
33.14%
1Y
73.64%
3Y*
27.63%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
13.35%

INTW

1D
10.59%
1M
28.23%
YTD
871.59%
6M
897.00%
1Y
2,279.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MIDU and INTW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.45

MIDU vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIDU
INTW

Industrials

5.3%

-

Technology

3.4%
66.7%

Financial Services

2.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.0%

-

Healthcare

1.8%

-

Real Estate

1.5%

-

Energy

1.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Utilities

0.6%

-

Communication Services

0.2%

-

Industrials

MIDU
5.3%
INTW

-

Technology

MIDU
3.4%
INTW
66.7%

Financial Services

MIDU
2.8%
INTW

-

Consumer Cyclical

MIDU
2.0%
INTW

-

Healthcare

MIDU
1.8%
INTW

-

Real Estate

MIDU
1.5%
INTW

-

Energy

MIDU
1.0%
INTW

-

Basic Materials

MIDU
1.0%
INTW

-

Consumer Defensive

MIDU
0.8%
INTW

-

Utilities

MIDU
0.6%
INTW

-

Communication Services

MIDU
0.2%
INTW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDU
MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

INTW
INTW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIDUINTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.68

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

46.81

-43.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

106.28

-96.76

MIDU vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 15.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDU and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIDU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and INTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDUINTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.26%

-60.58%

-25.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-49.34%

+23.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

0.00%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.38%

-29.71%

+7.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

21.69%

-13.93%

Volatility

MIDU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) is 13.42%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 53.88%. This indicates that MIDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDUINTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.42%

53.88%

-40.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.76%

118.13%

-83.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.36%

149.77%

-102.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.48%

148.63%

-89.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.68%

148.63%

-84.95%

MIDU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
INTW
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.62%1.04%1.10%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.71%0.70%2.67%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIDU and INTW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTW has higher volatility (53.88%) compared to MIDU (13.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs INTW's -60.58%.

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 2279.34% vs 73.64% for MIDU. On fees, MIDU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, MIDU has been the lower-risk option at 13.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 2279.34% return vs 73.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MIDU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

MIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 1.50% for INTW.

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.45 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDU and INTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer