MIDU vs. INTW
MIDU (Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MIDU is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, MIDU returned 73.64% vs 2279.34% for INTW. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MIDU charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
MIDU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 42.23% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 871.59% return.
MIDU
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 10.15%
- YTD
- 42.23%
- 6M
- 33.14%
- 1Y
- 73.64%
- 3Y*
- 27.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.35%
INTW
- 1D
- 10.59%
- 1M
- 28.23%
- YTD
- 871.59%
- 6M
- 897.00%
- 1Y
- 2,279.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MIDU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 42.23% | -5.71% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 871.59% | 60.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDU and INTW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.45 |
MIDU vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIDU
INTW
Industrials
-
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
MIDU
INTW
-
Technology
MIDU
INTW
Financial Services
MIDU
INTW
-
Consumer Cyclical
MIDU
INTW
-
Healthcare
MIDU
INTW
-
Real Estate
MIDU
INTW
-
Energy
MIDU
INTW
-
Basic Materials
MIDU
INTW
-
Consumer Defensive
MIDU
INTW
-
Utilities
MIDU
INTW
-
Communication Services
MIDU
INTW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIDU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
MIDU
INTW
MIDU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIDU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -13.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.68 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 46.81 | -43.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.51 | 106.28 | -96.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIDU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.26% | -60.58% | -25.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.80% | -49.34% | +23.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | 0.00% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.38% | -29.71% | +7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.76% | 21.69% | -13.93% |
Volatility
MIDU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) is 13.42%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 53.88%. This indicates that MIDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIDU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.42% | 53.88% | -40.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.76% | 118.13% | -83.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.36% | 149.77% | -102.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.48% | 148.63% | -89.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.68% | 148.63% | -84.95% |
MIDU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIDU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.62% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.71% | 0.70% | 2.67% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIDU and INTW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTW has higher volatility (53.88%) compared to MIDU (13.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs INTW's -60.58%.
On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 2279.34% vs 73.64% for MIDU. On fees, MIDU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, MIDU has been the lower-risk option at 13.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 2279.34% return vs 73.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MIDU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
MIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 1.50% for INTW.
INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.45 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIDU and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer