INTW vs. LITX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTW charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.

Performance

INTW vs. LITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INTW

• 1D: 10.59%
• 1M: 28.23%
• YTD: 871.59%
• 6M: 897.00%
• 1Y: 2,279.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LITX

• 1D: 9.82%
• 1M: -17.69%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTW vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	703.45%
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF	304.47%

Correlation

The correlation between INTW and LITX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026	0.37

Return for Risk

INTW vs. LITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

LITX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTW vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INTW	LITX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	15.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.37	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	46.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	106.28	—	—

Drawdowns

INTW vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTW drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -51.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTW and LITX.

Drawdown Indicators

	INTW	LITX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.58%	-51.46%	-9.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-35.78%	+35.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.71%	-16.83%	-12.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INTW	LITX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	53.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	118.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	149.77%	195.89%	-46.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	148.63%	195.89%	-47.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	148.63%	195.89%	-47.26%

INTW vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTW has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

INTW vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison

Neither INTW nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INTW and LITX in my portfolio?

INTW and LITX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INTW or LITX?

On fees, LITX is cheaper at 1.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INTW or LITX?

LITX is cheaper with a 1.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INTW or LITX?

INTW and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between INTW and LITX?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for INTW and 1.49% for LITX.