MIDE vs. XJH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MIDE (Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF) and XJH (iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - MIDE tracks the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index while XJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIDE returned 8.50%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for XJH. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MIDE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XJH.

Performance

MIDE vs. XJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MIDE having a 14.24% return and XJH slightly higher at 14.60%.

MIDE

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 12.29%
• 1Y: 27.07%
• 3Y*: 16.08%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: —

XJH

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 14.60%
• 6M: 12.44%
• 1Y: 26.24%
• 3Y*: 15.83%
• 5Y*: 7.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDE vs. XJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF	14.24%	9.81%	11.21%	15.20%	-11.63%	11.80%
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	14.60%	8.12%	12.27%	16.74%	-14.36%	12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDE and XJH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021	0.99

The correlation between MIDE and XJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

MIDE vs. XJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MIDE	XJH
Industrials	21.9%	26.8%
Technology	18.6%	16.7%
Financial Services	15.1%	14.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	9.6%
Healthcare	9.0%	9.7%
Real Estate	8.4%	8.1%
Energy	5.4%	2.9%
Basic Materials	4.5%	5.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	4.2%
Utilities	1.7%	1.5%
Communication Services	1.2%	1.1%

Return for Risk

MIDE vs. XJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDE

MIDE Risk / Return Rank: 57
MIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
MIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 50
MIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
MIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

XJH

XJH Risk / Return Rank: 53
XJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XJH Omega Ratio Rank: 45
XJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
XJH Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDE vs. XJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIDE	XJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.59	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	2.32	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.27	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	2.74	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.33	10.10	+0.23

MIDE vs. XJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the XJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDE and XJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIDE vs. XJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, roughly equal to the maximum XJH drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and XJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIDE	XJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.59%	-25.07%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-9.61%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.59%	-24.56%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.59%	-25.07%	+0.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-0.80%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-6.77%	+0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	2.61%	+0.02%

Volatility

MIDE vs. XJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) is 4.58%, while iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that MIDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIDE	XJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	4.85%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.72%	12.34%	-0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	16.64%	-0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.72%	19.96%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.65%	19.87%	-0.22%

MIDE vs. XJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XJH's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MIDE vs. XJH - Dividend Comparison

MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than XJH's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF	1.27%	1.52%	1.45%	1.36%	1.33%	0.93%	0.00%
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	1.09%	1.24%	1.24%	1.38%	1.45%	1.04%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIDE and XJH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, MIDE and XJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MIDE or XJH?

XJH has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to MIDE (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDE dropped -24.59% vs XJH's -25.07%.

Which ETF is better, MIDE or XJH?

On 5-year performance, MIDE leads with 8.50% vs 7.93% for XJH. On fees, XJH is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MIDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MIDE or XJH?

Over the 5-year period, MIDE has performed better with a 8.50% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MIDE or XJH?

XJH is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MIDE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MIDE or XJH?

MIDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.09% for XJH.

What is the main difference between MIDE and XJH?

MIDE tracks S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while XJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.12% for XJH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.