MIDE vs. TUSA
MIDE (Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF) and TUSA (First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - MIDE tracks the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index while TUSA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIDE returned 8.31%/yr vs 6.32%/yr for TUSA. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIDE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for TUSA.
Performance
MIDE vs. TUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly higher than TUSA's 6.54% return.
MIDE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
TUSA
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
MIDE vs. TUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 14.45% | 9.81% | 11.21% | 15.20% | -11.63% | 11.77% |
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 6.54% | 13.64% | 11.12% | 11.75% | -13.54% | 11.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDE and TUSA is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between MIDE and TUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MIDE vs. TUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIDE
TUSA
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MIDE
TUSA
Financial Services
MIDE
TUSA
Technology
MIDE
TUSA
Consumer Cyclical
MIDE
TUSA
Healthcare
MIDE
TUSA
Real Estate
MIDE
TUSA
Energy
MIDE
TUSA
Basic Materials
MIDE
TUSA
Consumer Defensive
MIDE
TUSA
Utilities
MIDE
TUSA
Communication Services
MIDE
TUSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIDE vs. TUSA — Risk / Return Rank
MIDE
TUSA
MIDE vs. TUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDE | TUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 2.81 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 7.56 | +3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDE | TUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.44 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.36 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.32 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
MIDE vs. TUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum TUSA drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and TUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDE | TUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -56.53% | +31.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -6.57% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.59% | -18.04% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.59% | -23.35% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -4.46% | +4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -9.87% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.44% | +0.18% |
Volatility
MIDE vs. TUSA - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) at 3.48%. This indicates that MIDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIDE | TUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 3.48% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 8.87% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 12.92% | +2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 17.65% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 20.14% | -0.47% |
MIDE vs. TUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TUSA's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIDE vs. TUSA - Dividend Comparison
MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than TUSA's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.31% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 1.66% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIDE and TUSA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MIDE has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to TUSA (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDE dropped -24.59% vs TUSA's -56.53%.
On 5-year performance, MIDE leads with 8.31% vs 6.32% for TUSA. On fees, MIDE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MIDE has performed better with a 8.31% return vs 6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MIDE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.
TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.31% for MIDE.
MIDE tracks S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.70% for TUSA.
MIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIDE and TUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer