MIDE vs. DBJP
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP).
MIDE and DBJP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MIDE is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021. DBJP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. It was launched on Jun 9, 2011. Both MIDE and DBJP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MIDE vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIDE vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.75% | 9.81% | 11.21% | 15.20% | -11.63% | 11.77% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 6.72% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 5.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 6.72% return.
MIDE
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- —
DBJP
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -6.59%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 18.90%
- 1Y
- 40.80%
- 3Y*
- 28.75%
- 5Y*
- 18.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIDE vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MIDE vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank
MIDE
DBJP
MIDE vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDE | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.74 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 2.40 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 3.16 | -1.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 12.34 | -6.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDE | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.74 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.99 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.65 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDE and DBJP is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MIDE vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than DBJP's 2.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.64% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
Drawdowns
MIDE vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum DBJP drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and DBJP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDE | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -31.30% | +6.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -12.11% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.59% | -21.50% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.73% | -7.24% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -7.35% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 3.21% | +0.27% |
Volatility
MIDE vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) is 6.31%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that MIDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIDE | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 8.10% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | 14.62% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.22% | 23.52% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 18.85% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 19.77% | +0.03% |