MICYX vs. USAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory Trivalent International Fund-Core Equity (MICYX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX).
MICYX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Aug 16, 2007. USAGX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Aug 14, 1984.
Performance
MICYX vs. USAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MICYX vs. USAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MICYX Victory Trivalent International Fund-Core Equity | -0.31% | 37.10% | 8.45% | 19.43% | -17.33% | 10.27% | 5.92% | 22.38% | -15.96% | 27.08% |
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund | -0.46% | 156.06% | 10.76% | 6.73% | -11.80% | -10.14% | 25.85% | 42.97% | -12.26% | 9.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MICYX achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly higher than USAGX's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MICYX has underperformed USAGX with an annualized return of 8.88%, while USAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.64% annualized return.
MICYX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -11.97%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 28.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
USAGX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -25.50%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 84.81%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 21.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MICYX vs. USAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MICYX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than USAGX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MICYX vs. USAGX — Risk / Return Rank
MICYX
USAGX
MICYX vs. USAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Trivalent International Fund-Core Equity (MICYX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MICYX | USAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 2.03 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 2.30 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 2.89 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | 10.78 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MICYX | USAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.03 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.68 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.48 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.19 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between MICYX and USAGX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MICYX vs. USAGX - Dividend Comparison
MICYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%, more than USAGX's 0.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MICYX Victory Trivalent International Fund-Core Equity | 10.80% | 10.77% | 3.57% | 3.75% | 2.63% | 3.67% | 1.45% | 1.14% | 4.38% | 6.90% | 2.04% | 1.93% |
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 2.45% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.20% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MICYX vs. USAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MICYX drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, smaller than the maximum USAGX drawdown of -80.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MICYX and USAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MICYX | USAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.61% | -80.89% | +16.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -30.12% | +17.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.05% | -45.72% | +15.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.68% | -51.03% | +13.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.29% | -25.50% | +13.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.98% | -43.17% | +23.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 8.09% | -5.07% |
Volatility
MICYX vs. USAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victory Trivalent International Fund-Core Equity (MICYX) is 7.68%, while USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that MICYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MICYX | USAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.68% | 15.38% | -7.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.76% | 35.05% | -23.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 42.75% | -25.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.70% | 32.06% | -16.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 32.73% | -16.16% |