PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MICYX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MICYX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Trivalent International Fund-Core Equity (MICYX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MICYX achieves a 20.02% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 10.72% return.


MICYX

1D
0.52%
1M
4.66%
YTD
20.02%
6M
19.90%
1Y
40.48%
3Y*
24.86%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
11.35%

FHLFX

1D
0.12%
1M
2.07%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.36%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MICYX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MICYX
Victory Trivalent International Fund-Core Equity
20.02%37.10%8.45%19.43%-17.33%10.27%5.92%22.38%-12.47%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
10.72%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MICYX and FHLFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.95

The correlation between MICYX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MICYX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MICYX
MICYX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MICYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MICYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MICYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MICYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MICYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MICYX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Trivalent International Fund-Core Equity (MICYX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MICYXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.31

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.26

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.34

8.44

+4.90

MICYX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MICYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MICYX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MICYX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MICYX drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MICYX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MICYXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.61%

-33.58%

-31.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-11.37%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.79%

-13.62%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.05%

-29.36%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.76%

-6.07%

-13.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.03%

+0.06%

Volatility

MICYX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Trivalent International Fund-Core Equity (MICYX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.75%. This indicates that MICYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MICYXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

4.75%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.63%

12.71%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.76%

15.27%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.06%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

17.65%

-0.89%

MICYX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MICYX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MICYX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

MICYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.97%, more than FHLFX's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.13%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MICYX
Victory Trivalent International Fund-Core Equity
8.97%10.77%3.57%3.75%2.63%3.67%1.45%1.14%4.38%6.90%2.04%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MICYX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MICYX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to FHLFX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MICYX dropped -64.61% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

MICYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MICYX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer