MGY vs. CBT
MGY (Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation) and CBT (Cabot Corporation) are both stocks. MGY operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while CBT operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, MGY returned 15.32%/yr vs 12.21%/yr for CBT. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MGY vs. CBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGY achieves a 18.86% return, which is significantly lower than CBT's 34.32% return.
MGY
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 18.86%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.24%
CBT
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 23.32%
- YTD
- 34.32%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 9.92%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $34.20M | $35.90M | $45.75M | |
| $287.30M | $162.60M | $107.25M |
MGY vs. CBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGY Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation | 18.86% | -3.85% | 12.20% | -7.26% | 26.52% | 168.77% | -43.88% | 12.22% | 15.09% | -2.60% |
CBT Cabot Corporation | 34.32% | -25.68% | 11.25% | 27.63% | 21.38% | 28.40% | -2.16% | 14.25% | -28.70% | 16.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGY and CBT is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2017 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGY and CBT has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MGY:
$4.76B
CBT:
$4.54B
MGY:
$1.76
CBT:
$5.85
MGY:
14.65
CBT:
15.04
MGY:
2.16
CBT:
0.82
MGY:
3.57
CBT:
1.30
MGY:
$1.32B
CBT:
$3.61B
MGY:
$438.05M
CBT:
$916.00M
MGY:
$846.92M
CBT:
$773.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGY vs. CBT — Risk / Return Rank
MGY
CBT
MGY vs. CBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) and Cabot Corporation (CBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGY | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.16 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 0.87 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.03 | 2.07 | -1.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGY vs. CBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGY drawdown since its inception was -77.76%, smaller than the maximum CBT drawdown of -82.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGY and CBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGY | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.76% | -82.87% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.26% | -28.82% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -48.78% | +17.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.14% | -48.78% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.08% | -21.78% | +1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -20.83% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.37% | 12.06% | -1.69% |
Volatility
MGY vs. CBT - Volatility Comparison
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) has a higher volatility of 13.47% compared to Cabot Corporation (CBT) at 9.01%. This indicates that MGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGY | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.47% | 9.01% | +4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.96% | 24.52% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.32% | 33.48% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.46% | 33.74% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.13% | 35.31% | +10.82% |
Dividends
MGY vs. CBT - Dividend Comparison
MGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than CBT's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBT Cabot Corporation | 2.07% | 2.69% | 1.85% | 1.88% | 2.21% | 2.53% | 3.12% | 2.90% | 3.04% | 2.02% | 2.22% | 2.15% |
MGY Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation | 2.45% | 2.74% | 2.22% | 2.16% | 1.71% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MGY vs. CBT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation and Cabot Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MGY vs. CBT - Profitability Comparison
MGY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 358.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CBT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cabot Corporation reported a gross profit of 211.00M and revenue of 849.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.9%.
MGY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation reported an operating income of 127.76M and revenue of 358.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.6%.
CBT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cabot Corporation reported an operating income of 129.00M and revenue of 849.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
MGY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation reported a net income of 99.83M and revenue of 358.51M, resulting in a net margin of 27.8%.
CBT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cabot Corporation reported a net income of 73.00M and revenue of 849.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MGY and CBT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGY has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to CBT (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGY dropped -77.76% vs CBT's -82.87%.
CBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGY and CBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer