PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGY vs. DUK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MGY vs. DUK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGY achieves a 30.37% return, which is significantly higher than DUK's 5.72% return.


MGY

1D
0.86%
1M
-8.08%
YTD
30.37%
6M
21.91%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*

DUK

1D
0.64%
1M
-3.69%
YTD
5.72%
6M
5.04%
1Y
8.71%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
8.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGY vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGY
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation
30.37%-3.85%12.20%-7.26%26.52%168.77%-43.88%12.22%15.09%-2.60%
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
5.72%12.72%15.56%-1.63%2.03%19.11%4.77%10.29%7.41%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MGY and DUK is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MGY:

$5.17B

DUK:

$94.90B

EPS

MGY:

$1.75

DUK:

$6.61

PE Ratio

MGY:

16.13

DUK:

18.44

PEG Ratio

MGY:

2.37

DUK:

1.44

PS Ratio

MGY:

3.94

DUK:

2.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

MGY:

$1.32B

DUK:

$33.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MGY:

$438.05M

DUK:

$19.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

MGY:

$846.92M

DUK:

$15.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGY vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGY
MGY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DUK
DUK Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGY vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGYDUKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.11

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

0.80

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.98

1.95

+2.03

MGY vs. DUK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the DUK Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGY and DUK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGYDUKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.61

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.44

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.49

-0.19

Drawdowns

MGY vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGY drawdown since its inception was -77.76%, which is greater than DUK's maximum drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGY and DUK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGYDUKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.76%

-71.92%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.34%

-10.88%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-11.59%

-19.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.14%

-24.16%

-13.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.34%

-7.93%

-4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.94%

-10.85%

-9.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.46%

4.47%

+2.99%

Volatility

MGY vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison

Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) at 4.90%. This indicates that MGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGYDUKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.34%

4.90%

+5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.22%

10.88%

+11.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.46%

14.39%

+16.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.80%

17.80%

+22.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.25%

20.37%

+25.88%

Dividends

MGY vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison

MGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than DUK's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
3.50%3.60%3.84%4.18%3.86%3.72%4.17%4.11%4.21%4.15%4.33%4.54%
MGY
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation
2.23%2.74%2.22%2.16%1.71%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MGY vs. DUK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation and Duke Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
358.51M
9.18B
(MGY) Total Revenue
(DUK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MGY vs. DUK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation and Duke Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
67.9%
Portfolio components
MGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 358.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.23B and revenue of 9.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.

MGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation reported an operating income of 127.76M and revenue of 358.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.6%.

DUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.73B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.

MGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation reported a net income of 99.83M and revenue of 358.51M, resulting in a net margin of 27.8%.

DUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MGY and DUK have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGY has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to DUK (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGY dropped -77.76% vs DUK's -71.92%.

MGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGY and DUK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer