CBT vs. AVGO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CBT (Cabot Corporation) and AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) are both stocks. CBT operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while AVGO operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CBT returned 9.16%/yr vs 43.94%/yr for AVGO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CBT vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabot Corporation (CBT) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBT achieves a 33.22% return, which is significantly lower than AVGO's 39.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CBT has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 9.16%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 43.94% annualized return.

CBT

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 13.50%
• YTD: 33.22%
• 6M: 38.07%
• 1Y: 20.78%
• 3Y*: 7.58%
• 5Y*: 8.61%
• 10Y*: 9.16%

AVGO

• 1D: 4.70%
• 1M: 14.31%
• YTD: 39.43%
• 6M: 26.71%
• 1Y: 95.20%
• 3Y*: 83.43%
• 5Y*: 62.84%
• 10Y*: 43.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBT vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CBT Cabot Corporation	33.22%	-25.68%	11.25%	27.63%	21.38%	28.40%	-2.16%	14.25%	-28.70%	24.65%
AVGO Broadcom Inc.	39.43%	50.63%	110.49%	104.18%	-13.27%	56.48%	44.88%	29.05%	2.18%	48.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CBT and AVGO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2009	0.38

The correlation between CBT and AVGO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS CBT : $5.83 AVGO : $5.12
PE Ratio CBT : 14.98 AVGO : 94.09
PEG Ratio CBT : 0.81 AVGO : 1.17
PS Ratio CBT : 1.29 AVGO : 34.41
Total Revenue (TTM) CBT : $3.61B AVGO : $68.28B
Gross Profit (TTM) CBT : $916.00M AVGO : $46.31B
EBITDA (TTM) CBT : $773.00M AVGO : $36.65B

Return for Risk

CBT vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBT

CBT Risk / Return Rank: 58
CBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CBT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CBT Martin Ratio Rank: 57

AVGO

AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 86
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBT vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabot Corporation (CBT) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBT	AVGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	2.23	-1.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	2.88	-1.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.36	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	3.51	-2.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.64	8.44	-6.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBT vs. AVGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBT and AVGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBT	AVGO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66	2.23	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	1.48	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	1.13	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	1.14	-0.92

Drawdowns

CBT vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBT drawdown since its inception was -82.87%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBT and AVGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBT	AVGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.87%	-48.30%	-34.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.82%	-28.67%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.78%	-41.15%	-7.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.78%	-41.15%	-7.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.20%	-48.30%	-18.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.42%	0.00%	-22.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.82%	-7.97%	-12.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.03%	11.91%	+0.12%

Volatility

CBT vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

Cabot Corporation (CBT) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) have volatilities of 11.97% and 11.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBT	AVGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.97%	11.99%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.21%	31.01%	-8.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.89%	43.01%	-11.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.54%	42.79%	-9.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.33%	39.19%	-3.86%

Dividends

CBT vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

CBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than AVGO's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVGO Broadcom Inc.	0.51%	0.70%	0.94%	1.71%	3.02%	2.24%	3.05%	3.54%	3.11%	1.87%	1.43%	1.13%
CBT Cabot Corporation	2.09%	2.69%	1.85%	1.88%	2.21%	2.53%	3.12%	2.90%	3.04%	2.02%	2.22%	2.15%

Financials

CBT vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cabot Corporation and Broadcom Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CBT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cabot Corporation reported a gross profit of 211.00M and revenue of 849.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.9%.

AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.16B and revenue of 19.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.

CBT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cabot Corporation reported an operating income of 129.00M and revenue of 849.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 8.56B and revenue of 19.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.3%.

CBT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cabot Corporation reported a net income of 73.00M and revenue of 849.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 7.35B and revenue of 19.31B, resulting in a net margin of 38.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBT and AVGO in my portfolio?

CBT and AVGO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBT or AVGO?

AVGO has higher volatility (11.99%) compared to CBT (11.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBT dropped -82.87% vs AVGO's -48.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.