PortfoliosLab logo
CBT vs. HRTG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CBT and HRTG is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CBT vs. HRTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabot Corporation (CBT) and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CBT:

-0.72

HRTG:

2.57

Sortino Ratio

CBT:

-0.96

HRTG:

3.08

Omega Ratio

CBT:

0.89

HRTG:

1.45

Calmar Ratio

CBT:

-0.65

HRTG:

2.87

Martin Ratio

CBT:

-1.24

HRTG:

9.50

Ulcer Index

CBT:

19.60%

HRTG:

22.16%

Daily Std Dev

CBT:

34.47%

HRTG:

73.87%

Max Drawdown

CBT:

-82.87%

HRTG:

-94.36%

Current Drawdown

CBT:

-35.20%

HRTG:

-5.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBT:

$4.04B

HRTG:

$735.16M

EPS

CBT:

$7.71

HRTG:

$2.53

PE Ratio

CBT:

9.75

HRTG:

9.38

PEG Ratio

CBT:

1.83

HRTG:

0.00

PS Ratio

CBT:

1.03

HRTG:

0.88

PB Ratio

CBT:

2.83

HRTG:

2.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBT:

$3.91B

HRTG:

$837.96M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBT:

$973.00M

HRTG:

$691.98M

EBITDA (TTM)

CBT:

$808.00M

HRTG:

$118.63M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBT achieves a -17.29% return, which is significantly lower than HRTG's 102.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CBT has outperformed HRTG with an annualized return of 8.67%, while HRTG has yielded a comparatively lower 2.88% annualized return.


CBT

YTD

-17.29%

1M

-4.33%

6M

-31.11%

1Y

-24.61%

3Y*

1.59%

5Y*

18.52%

10Y*

8.67%

HRTG

YTD

102.23%

1M

29.47%

6M

96.86%

1Y

187.54%

3Y*

89.44%

5Y*

16.00%

10Y*

2.88%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cabot Corporation

Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CBT vs. HRTG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CBT is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CBT is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CBT is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CBT is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CBT is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CBT is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

HRTG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HRTG is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HRTG is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HRTG is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HRTG is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HRTG is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HRTG is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CBT vs. HRTG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabot Corporation (CBT) and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CBT Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the HRTG Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBT and HRTG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CBT vs. HRTG - Dividend Comparison

CBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, while HRTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CBT
Cabot Corporation
2.91%1.85%1.88%2.21%2.53%3.12%2.90%3.04%2.02%2.22%2.68%1.96%
HRTG
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%6.67%4.08%2.37%1.81%1.63%1.33%1.47%0.23%0.00%

Drawdowns

CBT vs. HRTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBT drawdown since its inception was -82.87%, smaller than the maximum HRTG drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBT and HRTG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CBT vs. HRTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabot Corporation (CBT) is 9.76%, while Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) has a volatility of 25.99%. This indicates that CBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CBT vs. HRTG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cabot Corporation and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
936.00M
211.52M
(CBT) Total Revenue
(HRTG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CBT vs. HRTG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cabot Corporation and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
25.8%
31.3%
(CBT) Gross Margin
(HRTG) Gross Margin
CBT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cabot Corporation reported a gross profit of 241.00M and revenue of 936.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.

HRTG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 66.30M and revenue of 211.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

CBT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cabot Corporation reported an operating income of 162.00M and revenue of 936.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

HRTG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 49.39M and revenue of 211.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.

CBT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cabot Corporation reported a net income of 94.00M and revenue of 936.00M, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.

HRTG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 30.47M and revenue of 211.52M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.