PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CBT vs. MPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CBTMPC
YTD Return32.50%8.14%
1Y Return42.87%6.72%
3Y Return (Ann)25.82%37.10%
5Y Return (Ann)20.83%23.71%
10Y Return (Ann)11.89%16.67%
Sharpe Ratio1.310.24
Sortino Ratio2.200.52
Omega Ratio1.271.07
Calmar Ratio2.390.21
Martin Ratio7.100.41
Ulcer Index5.91%17.27%
Daily Std Dev32.07%29.45%
Max Drawdown-82.87%-79.67%
Current Drawdown-6.68%-27.14%

Fundamentals


CBTMPC
Market Cap$6.33B$49.88B
EPS$6.49$12.89
PE Ratio17.3412.04
PEG Ratio1.8315.65
Total Revenue (TTM)$3.99B$142.17B
Gross Profit (TTM)$961.00M$11.45B
EBITDA (TTM)$750.00M$10.28B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CBT and MPC is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CBT vs. MPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CBT achieves a 32.50% return, which is significantly higher than MPC's 8.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CBT has underperformed MPC with an annualized return of 11.89%, while MPC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.67% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.41%
-9.08%
CBT
MPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CBT vs. MPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabot Corporation (CBT) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CBT, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CBT, currently valued at 2.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.20
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CBT, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CBT, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CBT, currently valued at 7.10, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.10
MPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MPC, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.24
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MPC, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.52
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MPC, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MPC, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MPC, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.41

CBT vs. MPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBT Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the MPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBT and MPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.31
0.24
CBT
MPC

Dividends

CBT vs. MPC - Dividend Comparison

CBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than MPC's 1.57% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CBT
Cabot Corporation
1.52%1.88%2.21%2.53%3.12%2.90%3.04%2.02%2.22%2.68%1.96%1.56%
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
1.57%2.07%2.14%3.63%5.61%3.52%3.12%2.30%2.70%2.20%2.04%1.68%

Drawdowns

CBT vs. MPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBT drawdown since its inception was -82.87%, roughly equal to the maximum MPC drawdown of -79.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBT and MPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.68%
-27.14%
CBT
MPC

Volatility

CBT vs. MPC - Volatility Comparison

Cabot Corporation (CBT) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) at 8.22%. This indicates that CBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.94%
8.22%
CBT
MPC

Financials

CBT vs. MPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cabot Corporation and Marathon Petroleum Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items