PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGXIX vs. BLNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGXIX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Equity Allocation Fund (MGXIX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGXIX achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 16.97% return.


MGXIX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.51%
YTD
11.99%
6M
12.95%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
10.12%

BLNDX

1D
1.23%
1M
1.65%
YTD
16.97%
6M
18.97%
1Y
30.65%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGXIX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MGXIX
MainStay Equity Allocation Fund
11.99%14.31%11.47%17.67%-17.08%20.76%15.71%
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
16.97%4.12%13.11%5.79%3.71%20.16%16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MGXIX and BLNDX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.68

The correlation between MGXIX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGXIX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGXIX
MGXIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MGXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MGXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNDX
BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGXIX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Equity Allocation Fund (MGXIX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGXIXBLNDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.18

2.48

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

3.23

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

6.57

-3.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.59

20.84

-8.25

MGXIX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGXIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGXIX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGXIXBLNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.48

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.82

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.06

-0.62

Drawdowns

MGXIX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGXIX drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGXIX and BLNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGXIXBLNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.45%

-17.69%

-35.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-4.75%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.23%

-17.69%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-17.69%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.31%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-3.19%

-5.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.50%

+0.59%

Volatility

MGXIX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay Equity Allocation Fund (MGXIX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) at 3.04%. This indicates that MGXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGXIXBLNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.04%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

9.53%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

12.74%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

11.66%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

11.76%

+5.36%

MGXIX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGXIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGXIX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

MGXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than BLNDX's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
0.63%0.73%5.74%3.71%2.67%6.11%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGXIX
MainStay Equity Allocation Fund
5.46%6.12%6.68%0.00%11.02%12.58%4.97%5.52%12.44%3.42%2.90%5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGXIX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGXIX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to BLNDX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGXIX dropped -53.45% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGXIX and BLNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer