PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGXIX vs. CONWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGXIX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Equity Allocation Fund (MGXIX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGXIX achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than CONWX's 5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, MGXIX has outperformed CONWX with an annualized return of 10.26%, while CONWX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.


MGXIX

1D
1.10%
1M
2.17%
YTD
12.27%
6M
11.47%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
10.26%

CONWX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
5.52%
6M
5.14%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
11.41%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGXIX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGXIX
MainStay Equity Allocation Fund
12.27%14.31%11.47%17.67%-17.08%20.76%15.71%24.59%-13.47%18.74%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
5.52%11.95%13.58%0.20%-2.51%19.73%8.76%16.84%-1.95%7.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MGXIX and CONWX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between MGXIX and CONWX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGXIX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGXIX
MGXIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MGXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MGXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CONWX
CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGXIX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Equity Allocation Fund (MGXIX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGXIXCONWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.12

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

9.37

+2.72

MGXIX vs. CONWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGXIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the CONWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGXIX and CONWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGXIX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGXIX drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, which is greater than CONWX's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGXIX and CONWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGXIXCONWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.45%

-26.09%

-27.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-4.44%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.23%

-9.86%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-12.49%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

-26.09%

-8.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-4.44%

+4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-2.78%

-5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.47%

+0.65%

Volatility

MGXIX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay Equity Allocation Fund (MGXIX) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) at 1.97%. This indicates that MGXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGXIXCONWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

1.97%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

5.23%

+5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

7.11%

+5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

10.20%

+5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

11.10%

+6.06%

MGXIX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGXIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGXIX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison

MGXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than CONWX's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
3.49%3.69%10.55%2.16%7.85%3.63%3.86%2.16%5.09%2.48%0.00%0.00%
MGXIX
MainStay Equity Allocation Fund
5.45%6.12%6.68%0.00%11.02%12.58%4.97%5.52%12.44%3.42%2.90%5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGXIX and CONWX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGXIX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to CONWX (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGXIX dropped -53.45% vs CONWX's -26.09%.

MGXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGXIX and CONWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer