PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGV vs. SPMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MGV vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MGV vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
3.51%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%11.34%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%

Returns By Period


MGV

1D
0.25%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
3.51%
6M
6.42%
1Y
15.59%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
12.08%

SPMV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MGV vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MGV vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGV vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGVSPMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.06

MGV vs. SPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGVSPMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and SPMV is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MGV vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than SPMV's 1.45% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
2.06%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.45%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MGV vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MGVSPMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

Volatility

MGV vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MGVSPMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%