PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGV vs. SPMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGV vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MGV

1D
0.77%
1M
4.80%
YTD
14.01%
6M
14.90%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
12.84%

SPMV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGV vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
14.01%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%11.34%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and SPMV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.75

The correlation between MGV and SPMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MGV vs. SPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGV
SPMV

Financial Services

23.9%
17.8%

Healthcare

16.6%
15.0%

Technology

14.2%
26.9%

Industrials

13.7%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.9%
10.7%

Energy

6.6%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
6.6%

Communication Services

3.4%
6.5%

Utilities

2.6%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.2%

Financial Services

MGV
23.9%
SPMV
17.8%

Healthcare

MGV
16.6%
SPMV
15.0%

Technology

MGV
14.2%
SPMV
26.9%

Industrials

MGV
13.7%
SPMV
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

MGV
11.9%
SPMV
10.7%

Energy

MGV
6.6%
SPMV
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MGV
3.7%
SPMV
6.6%

Communication Services

MGV
3.4%
SPMV
6.5%

Utilities

MGV
2.6%
SPMV
2.8%

Basic Materials

MGV
2.4%
SPMV
2.6%

Real Estate

MGV
1.2%
SPMV
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGV vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGV vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGVSPMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

MGV vs. SPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGVSPMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

Drawdowns

MGV vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGVSPMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

Volatility

MGV vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGVSPMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

MGV vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGV vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than SPMV's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.87%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.45%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGV and SPMV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for SPMV.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.45% for SPMV.

MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPMV is S&P 500. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.10% for SPMV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGV and SPMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer