PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGV vs. SPMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGV vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MGV

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.09%
6M
10.64%
YTD
17.26%
1Y
29.26%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
9.32%

SPMV

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.79M$38.66M$40.05M

MGV vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
17.26%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%11.07%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and SPMV is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between MGV and SPMV has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MGV vs. SPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGV
SPMV

Financial Services

23.1%
17.8%

Technology

18.1%
26.9%

Healthcare

16.7%
15.0%

Industrials

13.8%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
10.7%

Energy

5.5%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
6.6%

Communication Services

3.0%
6.5%

Basic Materials

2.3%
2.6%

Utilities

2.0%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.2%

Financial Services

MGV
23.1%
SPMV
17.8%

Technology

MGV
18.1%
SPMV
26.9%

Healthcare

MGV
16.7%
SPMV
15.0%

Industrials

MGV
13.8%
SPMV
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

MGV
10.7%
SPMV
10.7%

Energy

MGV
5.5%
SPMV
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MGV
3.8%
SPMV
6.6%

Communication Services

MGV
3.0%
SPMV
6.5%

Basic Materials

MGV
2.3%
SPMV
2.6%

Utilities

MGV
2.0%
SPMV
2.8%

Real Estate

MGV
1.0%
SPMV
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGV vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGV vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGVSPMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.81

MGV vs. SPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGV vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGVSPMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

Volatility

MGV vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGVSPMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

MGV vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGV vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, while SPMV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.86%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.05%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGV and SPMV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for SPMV.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.05% for SPMV.

MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPMV is S&P 500. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.10% for SPMV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGV and SPMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer