MGSEX vs. FERCX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX).
MGSEX is managed by AMG. It was launched on May 31, 1984. FERCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 15, 1999.
Performance
MGSEX vs. FERCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGSEX vs. FERCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund | 7.63% | 41.56% | 7.23% | -4.82% | -27.91% | 0.83% | 38.74% | 80.58% | -3.77% | 20.26% |
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C | 3.43% | 35.65% | 19.76% | 12.64% | -31.29% | -15.75% | 71.24% | 29.64% | -15.72% | 45.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGSEX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly higher than FERCX's 3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MGSEX has outperformed FERCX with an annualized return of 14.25%, while FERCX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.88% annualized return.
MGSEX
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 51.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.25%
FERCX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -9.40%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- 1Y
- 35.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- 1.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGSEX vs. FERCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGSEX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FERCX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGSEX vs. FERCX — Risk / Return Rank
MGSEX
FERCX
MGSEX vs. FERCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGSEX | FERCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.36 | 1.80 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.91 | 2.36 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 2.60 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.93 | 9.26 | +2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGSEX | FERCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 1.80 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.06 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.40 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGSEX and FERCX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MGSEX vs. FERCX - Dividend Comparison
MGSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 83.77% | 4.35% | 59.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.89% | 7.03% | 5.13% | 6.53% | 0.03% | 0.56% | 0.92% |
Drawdowns
MGSEX vs. FERCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGSEX drawdown since its inception was -62.06%, roughly equal to the maximum FERCX drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGSEX and FERCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGSEX | FERCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.06% | -61.15% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.34% | -13.62% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.13% | -53.94% | +10.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.32% | -58.44% | +13.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.42% | -11.24% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -21.33% | +7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 3.83% | +0.30% |
Volatility
MGSEX vs. FERCX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) have volatilities of 10.15% and 10.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGSEX | FERCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.15% | 10.18% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | 14.84% | +2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.87% | 20.43% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 22.59% | -3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.63% | 20.72% | +4.91% |