PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FERCX vs. FIVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FERCX vs. FIVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FERCX

1D
2.18%
1M
12.36%
YTD
37.01%
6M
41.62%
1Y
71.59%
3Y*
33.15%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
15.06%

FIVFX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FERCX vs. FIVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FERCX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C
37.01%35.65%19.76%12.64%-31.29%-15.75%71.24%29.64%-15.72%45.46%
FIVFX
Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund
0.00%19.54%8.05%27.58%-26.48%12.14%22.32%33.05%-12.87%35.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FERCX and FIVFX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 1999

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between FERCX and FIVFX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FERCX vs. FIVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERCX
FERCX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FIVFX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FERCX vs. FIVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FERCXFIVFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.03

FERCX vs. FIVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FERCXFIVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

Drawdowns

FERCX vs. FIVFX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FERCXFIVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

Volatility

FERCX vs. FIVFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FERCXFIVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

FERCX vs. FIVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FERCX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FIVFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FERCX vs. FIVFX - Dividend Comparison

FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FERCX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.89%7.03%5.13%6.53%0.03%0.56%0.92%
FIVFX
Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund
10.67%10.67%4.19%0.38%0.05%9.08%1.28%3.29%3.00%2.99%0.68%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FERCX and FIVFX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FERCX and FIVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer