FERCX vs. MASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX).
FERCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 15, 1999. MASGX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on Apr 29, 2015.
Performance
FERCX vs. MASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FERCX vs. MASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C | 0.65% | 35.65% | 19.76% | 12.64% | -31.29% | -15.75% | 71.24% | 29.64% | -15.72% | 45.46% |
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund | 4.69% | 22.83% | -2.51% | 7.99% | -14.37% | 5.33% | 42.90% | 12.56% | -9.70% | 33.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FERCX achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than MASGX's 4.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FERCX has outperformed MASGX with an annualized return of 11.57%, while MASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.21% annualized return.
FERCX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.60%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 32.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
MASGX
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -13.33%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FERCX vs. MASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FERCX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than MASGX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FERCX vs. MASGX — Risk / Return Rank
FERCX
MASGX
FERCX vs. MASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FERCX | MASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 1.45 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 1.94 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 1.44 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 5.06 | +2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FERCX | MASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.45 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.15 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.51 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.50 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FERCX and MASGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FERCX vs. MASGX - Dividend Comparison
FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.89% | 7.03% | 5.13% | 6.53% | 0.03% | 0.56% | 0.92% |
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund | 5.33% | 5.58% | 2.58% | 7.52% | 5.39% | 2.60% | 5.66% | 1.36% | 4.52% | 3.70% | 1.47% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FERCX vs. MASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FERCX drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than MASGX's maximum drawdown of -36.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERCX and MASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FERCX | MASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -36.34% | -24.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -14.20% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.94% | -36.34% | -17.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.44% | -36.34% | -22.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.62% | -14.20% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.34% | -11.38% | -9.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 4.36% | -0.60% |
Volatility
FERCX vs. MASGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) have volatilities of 9.62% and 9.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FERCX | MASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.62% | 9.85% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.64% | 15.17% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 20.08% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 20.13% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 18.20% | +2.51% |