FERCX vs. MASGX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FERCX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C) and MASGX (Matthews Asia ESG Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FERCX returned 12.94%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for MASGX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FERCX charges 1.96%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for MASGX.

Performance

FERCX vs. MASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERCX achieves a 22.95% return, which is significantly lower than MASGX's 28.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FERCX has outperformed MASGX with an annualized return of 12.94%, while MASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.77% annualized return.

FERCX

• 1D: 3.45%
• 1M: -6.74%
• 6M: 12.80%
• YTD: 22.95%
• 1Y: 41.29%
• 3Y*: 26.04%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 12.94%
• ALL TIME*: 9.03%

MASGX

• 1D: 4.14%
• 1M: -9.40%
• 6M: 15.47%
• YTD: 28.81%
• 1Y: 46.89%
• 3Y*: 12.31%
• 5Y*: 5.68%
• 10Y*: 10.77%
• ALL TIME*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FERCX vs. MASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	22.95%	35.65%	19.76%	12.64%	-31.29%	-15.75%	71.24%	29.64%	-15.72%	45.46%
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund	28.81%	22.83%	-2.51%	7.99%	-14.37%	5.33%	42.90%	12.56%	-9.70%	33.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FERCX and MASGX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.84

The correlation between FERCX and MASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FERCX vs. MASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FERCX

FERCX Risk / Return Rank: 60
FERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

MASGX

MASGX Risk / Return Rank: 66
MASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
MASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
MASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
MASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FERCX vs. MASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FERCX	MASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.63	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.13	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.30	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	2.26	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.95	8.27	-0.33

FERCX vs. MASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the MASGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERCX and MASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FERCX vs. MASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERCX drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than MASGX's maximum drawdown of -36.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERCX and MASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FERCX	MASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.15%	-36.34%	-24.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.66%	-19.80%	+4.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.64%	-24.94%	+7.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.15%	-36.34%	-14.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.44%	-36.34%	-22.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.75%	-16.48%	+3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.12%	-11.18%	-9.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.82%	5.41%	-0.59%

Volatility

FERCX vs. MASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) is 9.96%, while Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that FERCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FERCX	MASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.96%	10.78%	-0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.06%	25.26%	-2.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.39%	27.59%	-2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.76%	22.03%	+1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.51%	19.42%	+2.09%

FERCX vs. MASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FERCX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than MASGX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

FERCX vs. MASGX - Dividend Comparison

FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.89%	7.03%	5.13%	6.53%	0.03%	0.56%	0.92%
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund	4.33%	5.58%	2.58%	7.52%	5.39%	2.60%	5.66%	1.36%	4.52%	3.70%	1.47%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FERCX and MASGX in my portfolio?

FERCX and MASGX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FERCX or MASGX?

MASGX has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to FERCX (9.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FERCX dropped -61.15% vs MASGX's -36.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.