MGSEX vs. FIQPX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MGSEX (AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund) and FIQPX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MGSEX returned 6.56%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for FIQPX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGSEX charges 1.18%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for FIQPX.

Performance

MGSEX vs. FIQPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGSEX achieves a 42.86% return, which is significantly higher than FIQPX's 34.62% return.

MGSEX

• 1D: -8.02%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 42.86%
• 6M: 44.81%
• 1Y: 72.97%
• 3Y*: 28.77%
• 5Y*: 6.56%
• 10Y*: 17.65%

FIQPX

• 1D: -4.99%
• 1M: 3.96%
• YTD: 34.62%
• 6M: 36.05%
• 1Y: 59.28%
• 3Y*: 33.76%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGSEX vs. FIQPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund	42.86%	41.56%	7.23%	-4.82%	-27.91%	0.83%	38.74%	80.58%	-15.37%
FIQPX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z	34.62%	37.22%	21.13%	13.98%	-30.50%	-14.73%	73.23%	31.17%	0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MGSEX and FIQPX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.79

The correlation between MGSEX and FIQPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MGSEX vs. FIQPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGSEX

MGSEX Risk / Return Rank: 85
MGSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
MGSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MGSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
MGSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
MGSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FIQPX

FIQPX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FIQPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FIQPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FIQPX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FIQPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FIQPX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGSEX vs. FIQPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGSEX	FIQPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	2.74	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.22	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.51	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.41	4.72	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.06	16.13	+0.94

MGSEX vs. FIQPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGSEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the FIQPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGSEX and FIQPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGSEX vs. FIQPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGSEX drawdown since its inception was -62.06%, which is greater than FIQPX's maximum drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGSEX and FIQPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGSEX	FIQPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.06%	-57.62%	-4.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.34%	-13.52%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.30%	-17.18%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.13%	-53.21%	+10.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.02%	-4.99%	-3.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.86%	-21.95%	+8.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.53%	3.95%	+0.58%

Volatility

MGSEX vs. FIQPX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) has a higher volatility of 18.03% compared to Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX) at 13.97%. This indicates that MGSEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIQPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGSEX	FIQPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.03%	13.97%	+4.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.73%	20.88%	+4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.86%	23.30%	+5.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.13%	23.56%	-2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.41%	23.33%	+3.08%

MGSEX vs. FIQPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGSEX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQPX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGSEX vs. FIQPX - Dividend Comparison

MGSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while FIQPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIQPX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	12.82%	6.63%	5.47%	6.97%
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund	0.10%	0.14%	0.47%	0.11%	0.00%	83.77%	4.35%	59.30%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGSEX and FIQPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, MGSEX and FIQPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MGSEX or FIQPX?

MGSEX has higher volatility (18.03%) compared to FIQPX (13.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGSEX dropped -62.06% vs FIQPX's -57.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIQPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.