PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FERCX vs. ASIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FERCX vs. ASIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERCX achieves a 37.01% return, which is significantly higher than ASIAX's 18.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FERCX has outperformed ASIAX with an annualized return of 15.06%, while ASIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.79% annualized return.


FERCX

1D
2.18%
1M
12.36%
YTD
37.01%
6M
41.62%
1Y
71.59%
3Y*
33.15%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
15.06%

ASIAX

1D
3.34%
1M
10.09%
YTD
18.54%
6M
21.24%
1Y
41.40%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FERCX vs. ASIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FERCX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C
37.01%35.65%19.76%12.64%-31.29%-15.75%71.24%29.64%-15.72%45.46%
ASIAX
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund
18.54%24.56%9.59%0.87%-10.82%-6.10%25.76%17.78%-11.50%29.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FERCX and ASIAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 1999

0.87

The correlation between FERCX and ASIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FERCX vs. ASIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERCX
FERCX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ASIAX
ASIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ASIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FERCX vs. ASIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FERCXASIAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.72

2.75

+0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.43

3.67

+0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.51

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.26

3.56

+1.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.03

13.96

+5.08

FERCX vs. ASIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.72, which is higher than the ASIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERCX and ASIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FERCXASIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72

2.75

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.39

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.58

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.50

-0.05

Drawdowns

FERCX vs. ASIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERCX drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, roughly equal to the maximum ASIAX drawdown of -63.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERCX and ASIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FERCXASIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-63.78%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.62%

-11.73%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-20.36%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.94%

-31.71%

-22.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.44%

-36.32%

-22.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

-15.10%

-6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

2.99%

+0.77%

Volatility

FERCX vs. ASIAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) at 6.14%. This indicates that FERCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FERCXASIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

6.14%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

12.63%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.79%

15.73%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

15.03%

+7.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

15.23%

+5.74%

FERCX vs. ASIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FERCX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than ASIAX's 1.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FERCX vs. ASIAX - Dividend Comparison

FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASIAX
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund
18.07%21.41%8.68%2.84%7.25%7.71%7.37%5.67%7.17%7.91%1.09%3.15%
FERCX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.89%7.03%5.13%6.53%0.03%0.56%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FERCX and ASIAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FERCX has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to ASIAX (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FERCX dropped -61.15% vs ASIAX's -63.78%.

FERCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FERCX and ASIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer