FERCX vs. DFRSX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FERCX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C) and DFRSX (DFA Asia Pacific Small Company) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FERCX returned 12.94%/yr vs 5.87%/yr for DFRSX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FERCX charges 1.96%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for DFRSX.

Performance

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERCX achieves a 22.95% return, which is significantly higher than DFRSX's 2.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FERCX has outperformed DFRSX with an annualized return of 12.94%, while DFRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.87% annualized return.

FERCX

• 1D: 3.45%
• 1M: -6.74%
• 6M: 12.80%
• YTD: 22.95%
• 1Y: 41.29%
• 3Y*: 26.04%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 12.94%
• ALL TIME*: 9.03%

DFRSX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 1.86%
• 6M: -4.66%
• YTD: 2.00%
• 1Y: 18.76%
• 3Y*: 11.51%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: 5.87%
• ALL TIME*: 6.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFRSX DFA Asia Pacific Small Company	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	22.95%	35.65%	19.76%	12.64%	-31.29%	-15.75%	71.24%	29.64%	-15.72%	45.46%
DFRSX DFA Asia Pacific Small Company	2.00%	34.73%	0.27%	3.99%	-16.96%	12.59%	14.24%	13.30%	-15.48%	25.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FERCX and DFRSX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 1999	0.68

The correlation between FERCX and DFRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FERCX vs. DFRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FERCX

FERCX Risk / Return Rank: 60
FERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

DFRSX

DFRSX Risk / Return Rank: 29
DFRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
DFRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
DFRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
DFRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
DFRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FERCX	DFRSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.08	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	1.56	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.20	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	1.25	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.95	3.06	+4.89

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the DFRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERCX and DFRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERCX drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum DFRSX drawdown of -69.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERCX and DFRSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FERCX	DFRSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.15%	-69.06%	+7.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.66%	-14.20%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.64%	-21.29%	+3.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.15%	-30.18%	-20.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.44%	-46.25%	-12.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.75%	-8.25%	-4.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.12%	-17.18%	-3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.82%	5.77%	-0.95%

Volatility

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) at 4.50%. This indicates that FERCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FERCX	DFRSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.96%	4.50%	+5.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.06%	13.72%	+9.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.39%	16.47%	+8.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.76%	17.41%	+6.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.51%	17.05%	+4.46%

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FERCX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than DFRSX's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Dividend Comparison

FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFRSX DFA Asia Pacific Small Company	4.82%	4.92%	4.66%	4.70%	9.99%	12.82%	2.91%	4.56%	3.48%	4.01%	3.79%	3.96%
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.89%	7.03%	5.13%	6.53%	0.03%	0.56%	0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FERCX and DFRSX in my portfolio?

FERCX and DFRSX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FERCX or DFRSX?

FERCX has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to DFRSX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FERCX dropped -61.15% vs DFRSX's -69.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FERCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.