PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FERCX vs. DFRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERCX achieves a 40.92% return, which is significantly higher than DFRSX's 3.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FERCX has outperformed DFRSX with an annualized return of 15.63%, while DFRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.94% annualized return.


FERCX

1D
0.81%
1M
9.34%
YTD
40.92%
6M
42.75%
1Y
70.14%
3Y*
34.51%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
15.63%

DFRSX

1D
0.04%
1M
1.23%
YTD
3.91%
6M
2.29%
1Y
28.91%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
6.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FERCX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C
40.92%35.65%19.76%12.64%-31.29%-15.75%71.24%29.64%-15.72%45.46%
DFRSX
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company
3.91%34.73%0.27%3.99%-16.96%12.59%14.24%13.30%-15.48%25.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FERCX and DFRSX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 1999

0.68

The correlation between FERCX and DFRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FERCX vs. DFRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERCX
FERCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

DFRSX
DFRSX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DFRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DFRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FERCXDFRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.34

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.29

2.09

+3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.05

6.06

+11.99

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is higher than the DFRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERCX and DFRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERCX drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum DFRSX drawdown of -69.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERCX and DFRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FERCXDFRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-69.06%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.62%

-14.20%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-21.29%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.94%

-30.18%

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.44%

-46.25%

-12.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.54%

+6.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.18%

-17.20%

-3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

4.88%

-0.90%

Volatility

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) has a higher volatility of 12.85% compared to DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) at 5.18%. This indicates that FERCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FERCXDFRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.85%

5.18%

+7.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.17%

13.33%

+6.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.74%

16.09%

+6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.45%

17.36%

+6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.27%

17.07%

+4.20%

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FERCX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than DFRSX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

FERCX vs. DFRSX - Dividend Comparison

FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFRSX
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company
4.73%4.92%4.66%4.70%9.99%12.82%2.91%4.56%3.48%4.01%3.79%3.96%
FERCX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.89%7.03%5.13%6.53%0.03%0.56%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FERCX and DFRSX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FERCX has higher volatility (12.85%) compared to DFRSX (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FERCX dropped -61.15% vs DFRSX's -69.06%.

FERCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FERCX and DFRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer