MGRAX vs. FNGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX) and Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX).
MGRAX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Oct 23, 1995. FNGAX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 3, 2008.
Performance
MGRAX vs. FNGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGRAX vs. FNGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGRAX MFS International Growth Fund | -3.56% | 20.73% | 8.82% | 14.54% | -15.31% | 9.20% | 15.45% | 26.83% | -9.09% | 32.15% |
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | -9.38% | 10.48% | 0.37% | 15.00% | -32.05% | 1.17% | 32.56% | 36.91% | -14.53% | 36.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGRAX achieves a -3.56% return, which is significantly higher than FNGAX's -9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MGRAX has outperformed FNGAX with an annualized return of 9.17%, while FNGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.58% annualized return.
MGRAX
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -8.25%
- YTD
- -3.56%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- 1Y
- 10.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
FNGAX
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- -8.15%
- YTD
- -9.38%
- 6M
- -11.57%
- 1Y
- 1.65%
- 3Y*
- 0.97%
- 5Y*
- -4.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGRAX vs. FNGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGRAX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGAX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGRAX vs. FNGAX — Risk / Return Rank
MGRAX
FNGAX
MGRAX vs. FNGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX) and Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGRAX | FNGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.11 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 0.30 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.04 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 0.05 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | 0.17 | +3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGRAX | FNGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.11 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | -0.21 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.28 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.18 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGRAX and FNGAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGRAX vs. FNGAX - Dividend Comparison
MGRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, more than FNGAX's 3.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGRAX MFS International Growth Fund | 5.55% | 5.35% | 5.99% | 2.56% | 2.69% | 6.62% | 0.56% | 1.42% | 3.82% | 2.26% | 1.01% | 1.06% |
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | 3.60% | 3.36% | 1.86% | 0.00% | 1.75% | 1.80% | 2.22% | 0.13% | 1.94% | 1.31% | 0.53% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
MGRAX vs. FNGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGRAX drawdown since its inception was -55.29%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGAX drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGRAX and FNGAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGRAX | FNGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.29% | -53.35% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -17.35% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.58% | -47.24% | +16.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.58% | -47.24% | +16.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.88% | -28.45% | +18.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -14.07% | +3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 4.98% | -1.83% |
Volatility
MGRAX vs. FNGAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX) is 6.53%, while Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that MGRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGRAX | FNGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 7.58% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 12.80% | -2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 19.97% | -5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 21.24% | -5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 20.21% | -4.55% |