PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGRAX vs. FRVLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGRAX vs. FRVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX) and Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGRAX achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than FRVLX's 15.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MGRAX has underperformed FRVLX with an annualized return of 9.62%, while FRVLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.11% annualized return.


MGRAX

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.65%
YTD
3.56%
6M
4.74%
1Y
10.25%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
9.62%

FRVLX

1D
-0.57%
1M
1.29%
YTD
15.28%
6M
17.87%
1Y
31.44%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGRAX vs. FRVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGRAX
MFS International Growth Fund
3.56%20.73%8.82%14.54%-15.31%9.20%15.45%26.83%-9.09%32.15%
FRVLX
Franklin Small Cap Value Fund
15.28%7.36%13.16%12.81%-10.25%22.51%5.45%26.08%-12.92%9.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MGRAX and FRVLX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 1996

0.61

The correlation between MGRAX and FRVLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGRAX vs. FRVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGRAX
MGRAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MGRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MGRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FRVLX
FRVLX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FRVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FRVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGRAX vs. FRVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX) and Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGRAXFRVLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.72

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

2.57

-1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.30

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.53

-1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.10

8.41

-5.32

MGRAX vs. FRVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGRAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the FRVLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGRAX and FRVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGRAXFRVLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.72

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.30

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.44

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.43

-0.04

Drawdowns

MGRAX vs. FRVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGRAX drawdown since its inception was -55.29%, smaller than the maximum FRVLX drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGRAX and FRVLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGRAXFRVLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.29%

-60.27%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-12.04%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-25.09%

+11.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.58%

-25.09%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.58%

-44.10%

+13.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-1.31%

-1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-10.32%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

3.62%

+0.06%

Volatility

MGRAX vs. FRVLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX) is 3.96%, while Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that MGRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGRAXFRVLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

4.94%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.71%

12.75%

-2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.29%

18.44%

-5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

21.58%

-6.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

22.82%

-7.09%

MGRAX vs. FRVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGRAX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FRVLX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGRAX vs. FRVLX - Dividend Comparison

MGRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, less than FRVLX's 6.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRVLX
Franklin Small Cap Value Fund
6.93%7.99%8.45%4.54%3.21%7.55%2.20%6.31%18.48%8.06%4.76%11.04%
MGRAX
MFS International Growth Fund
5.17%5.35%5.99%2.56%2.69%6.62%0.56%1.42%3.82%2.26%1.01%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGRAX and FRVLX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRVLX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to MGRAX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGRAX dropped -55.29% vs FRVLX's -60.27%.

FRVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGRAX and FRVLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer