MGK vs. TQQQ
MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGK returned 18.78%/yr vs 44.95%/yr for TQQQ. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
MGK vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 36.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 18.78%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.95% annualized return.
MGK
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.58%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 16.13%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.55%
- 10Y*
- 18.78%
TQQQ
- 1D
- -4.16%
- 1M
- -15.05%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 30.08%
- 1Y
- 77.18%
- 3Y*
- 55.74%
- 5Y*
- 20.68%
- 10Y*
- 44.95%
MGK vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 2.27% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 36.47% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGK and TQQQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.97 |
The correlation between MGK and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGK vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGK
TQQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Technology
MGK
TQQQ
Communication Services
MGK
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
MGK
TQQQ
Healthcare
MGK
TQQQ
Financial Services
MGK
TQQQ
Real Estate
MGK
TQQQ
Utilities
MGK
TQQQ
Industrials
MGK
TQQQ
Basic Materials
MGK
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
MGK
TQQQ
Energy
MGK
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGK vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
MGK
TQQQ
MGK vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGK | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.15 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 6.75 | -3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGK vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGK | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.43% | -81.66% | +33.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -36.97% | +20.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -58.04% | +34.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -81.66% | +45.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.01% | -81.66% | +45.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.37% | -17.65% | +9.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -18.49% | +10.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 11.72% | -6.62% |
Volatility
MGK vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) is 7.04%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 27.08%. This indicates that MGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGK | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 27.08% | -20.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.69% | 43.49% | -29.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.26% | 53.41% | -36.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 67.42% | -44.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 66.28% | -44.34% |
MGK vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGK vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than TQQQ's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.29% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, MGK and TQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TQQQ has higher volatility (27.08%) compared to MGK (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.95% vs 18.78% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 7.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.95% return vs 18.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.29% for TQQQ.
MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGK and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer