MGK vs. PPA
MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGK returned 18.85%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for PPA. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPA.
Performance
MGK vs. PPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has outperformed PPA with an annualized return of 18.85%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively lower 17.72% annualized return.
MGK
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
PPA
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 28.73%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- 17.72%
MGK vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 5.33% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 11.20% | 37.15% | 25.28% | 18.41% | 9.52% | 7.09% | 0.45% | 39.63% | -7.51% | 30.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGK and PPA is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGK and PPA has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MGK vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGK
PPA
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
MGK
PPA
Communication Services
MGK
PPA
Consumer Cyclical
MGK
PPA
-
Healthcare
MGK
PPA
-
Financial Services
MGK
PPA
Real Estate
MGK
PPA
-
Utilities
MGK
PPA
-
Industrials
MGK
PPA
Basic Materials
MGK
PPA
-
Consumer Defensive
MGK
PPA
-
Energy
MGK
-
PPA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGK vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank
MGK
PPA
MGK vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGK | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.11 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 5.94 | -1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGK vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and PPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGK | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.43% | -57.37% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -13.71% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -15.24% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -18.37% | -17.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.01% | -43.92% | +7.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -6.15% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -9.18% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.97% | 4.85% | +0.12% |
Volatility
MGK vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) is 5.96%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 8.91%. This indicates that MGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGK | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 8.91% | -2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 17.06% | -3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 20.04% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 18.70% | +4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 20.73% | +1.20% |
MGK vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGK vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison
MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than PPA's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.38% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGK and PPA have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPA has higher volatility (8.91%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs PPA's -57.37%.
On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 18.85% vs 17.72% for PPA. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 17.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.
PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.
MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.58% for PPA.
PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGK and PPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer