PPA vs. XAR
PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - PPA tracks the SPADE Defense Index while XAR tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPA returned 17.85%/yr vs 18.54%/yr for XAR. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PPA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
PPA vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 15.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PPA having a 17.85% annualized return and XAR not far ahead at 18.54%.
PPA
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 8.28%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 29.01%
- 5Y*
- 18.72%
- 10Y*
- 17.85%
XAR
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 11.31%
- 1Y
- 40.45%
- 3Y*
- 33.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.54%
- 10Y*
- 18.54%
PPA vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 10.34% | 37.15% | 25.28% | 18.41% | 9.52% | 7.09% | 0.45% | 39.63% | -7.51% | 30.10% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 15.26% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPA and XAR is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PPA and XAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
PPA vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPA
XAR
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
PPA
XAR
Technology
PPA
XAR
Communication Services
PPA
XAR
-
Financial Services
PPA
XAR
-
Basic Materials
PPA
-
XAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
PPA
-
XAR
-
Consumer Defensive
PPA
-
XAR
-
Energy
PPA
-
XAR
-
Healthcare
PPA
-
XAR
-
Real Estate
PPA
-
XAR
-
Utilities
PPA
-
XAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPA vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
PPA
XAR
PPA vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPA | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.36 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | 6.60 | -0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPA vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPA | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.37% | -46.37% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -17.22% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | -19.73% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | -32.40% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.92% | -46.37% | +2.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -5.02% | -1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -6.78% | -2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 6.15% | -1.24% |
Volatility
PPA vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) is 8.37%, while SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that PPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPA | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 10.60% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.10% | 23.50% | -6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | 28.02% | -7.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 23.69% | -4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 24.77% | -4.02% |
PPA vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPA vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than XAR's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.46% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.34% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, PPA and XAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XAR has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to PPA (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPA dropped -57.37% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 18.54% vs 17.85% for PPA. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PPA has been the lower-risk option at 8.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 18.54% return vs 17.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.
PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.34% for XAR.
PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.35% for XAR.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPA and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer