MGK vs. OILK
MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MGK returned 16.84%/yr vs 17.52%/yr for OILK. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
MGK vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.95% return.
MGK
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 8.29%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 32.46%
- 3Y*
- 27.25%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.37%
OILK
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 61.95%
- 6M
- 59.31%
- 1Y
- 57.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- —
MGK vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 11.27% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 61.95% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGK and OILK is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.12 |
The correlation between MGK and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MGK vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGK
OILK
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
MGK
OILK
-
Communication Services
MGK
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
MGK
OILK
Healthcare
MGK
OILK
-
Financial Services
MGK
OILK
-
Real Estate
MGK
OILK
-
Utilities
MGK
OILK
-
Industrials
MGK
OILK
-
Basic Materials
MGK
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
MGK
OILK
-
Energy
MGK
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGK vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
MGK
OILK
MGK vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGK | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 2.03 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | 2.55 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 3.61 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.90 | 7.33 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGK | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.03 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.59 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.11 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
MGK vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGK | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.97% | -83.76% | +35.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -17.35% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -23.42% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -34.69% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -4.99% | +4.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -32.62% | +25.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 8.56% | -3.67% |
Volatility
MGK vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) is 3.75%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that MGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGK | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 11.11% | -7.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 23.24% | -10.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 28.86% | -12.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 30.11% | -7.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 35.98% | -14.10% |
MGK vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGK vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than OILK's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.31% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.29% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGK and OILK have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to MGK (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -47.97% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.52% vs 16.84% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.52% return vs 16.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 0.31% for MGK.
MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGK and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer