MGK vs. ITOT
MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MGK tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index while ITOT tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGK returned 19.24%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
MGK vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has outperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 19.24%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively lower 15.01% annualized return.
MGK
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- 16.25%
- 10Y*
- 19.24%
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
MGK vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 10.01% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGK and ITOT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.93 |
The correlation between MGK and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGK vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGK
ITOT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Technology
MGK
ITOT
Communication Services
MGK
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
MGK
ITOT
Healthcare
MGK
ITOT
Financial Services
MGK
ITOT
Real Estate
MGK
ITOT
Utilities
MGK
ITOT
Industrials
MGK
ITOT
Basic Materials
MGK
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
MGK
ITOT
Energy
MGK
-
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGK vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
MGK
ITOT
MGK vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGK | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 2.32 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 3.17 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.17 | -1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 14.57 | -8.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGK | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.32 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.74 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.82 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.57 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
MGK vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGK | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.97% | -55.20% | +7.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -8.90% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -19.44% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -25.36% | -10.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.01% | -35.00% | -1.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.73% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -6.97% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 1.94% | +2.95% |
Volatility
MGK vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGK | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 2.99% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 9.13% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.23% | 12.20% | +4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 17.36% | +5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 18.26% | +3.62% |
MGK vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGK vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGK and ITOT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGK has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -47.97% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 19.24% vs 15.01% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 19.24% return vs 15.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGK.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.32% for MGK.
MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGK and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer