MGK vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MGK returned 15.44%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

MGK vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 0.30% return.

MGK

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 6.52%
• 6M: 5.59%
• 1Y: 25.21%
• 3Y*: 25.50%
• 5Y*: 15.44%
• 10Y*: 18.91%

GLDM

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -8.41%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 3.19%
• 1Y: 30.55%
• 3Y*: 30.08%
• 5Y*: 17.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF	6.52%	20.67%	32.94%	51.67%	-33.59%	28.58%	41.01%	37.38%	-9.28%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.30%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and GLDM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018	0.07

MGK vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MGK	GLDM
Technology	56.1%	-
Communication Services	17.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	-
Healthcare	4.5%	-
Financial Services	4.5%	-
Real Estate	1.3%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-
Industrials	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.7%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	-
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

MGK vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK

MGK Risk / Return Rank: 42
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 36

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 34
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MGK	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.15	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	1.54	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.23	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	1.53	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.15	3.85	+1.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MGK vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MGK	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	1.15	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	1.00	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.99	-0.34

Drawdowns

MGK vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGK	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.97%	-21.63%	-26.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.85%	-20.00%	+3.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.36%	-20.00%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.01%	-20.92%	-15.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.56%	-19.80%	+15.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.47%	-6.24%	-1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.91%	7.96%	-3.05%

Volatility

MGK vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) have volatilities of 5.41% and 5.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGK	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	5.65%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.96%	23.31%	-10.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.65%	26.65%	-10.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.69%	17.98%	+4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	16.89%	+5.03%

MGK vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MGK vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF	0.33%	0.35%	0.43%	0.50%	0.70%	0.41%	0.65%	0.85%	1.12%	1.23%	1.53%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGK and GLDM in my portfolio?

MGK and GLDM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGK or GLDM?

GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to MGK (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -47.97% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

Which ETF is better, MGK or GLDM?

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.89% vs 15.44% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MGK or GLDM?

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 15.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MGK or GLDM?

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MGK or GLDM?

MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between MGK and GLDM?

MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GLDM is Gold. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.