MGC vs. STRN
MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) and STRN (SMART Trend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while STRN is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by SmartWay. MGC is passively managed, while STRN is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGC charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for STRN.
Performance
MGC vs. STRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly lower than STRN's 19.31% return.
MGC
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 22.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- 15.89%
STRN
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- YTD
- 19.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MGC vs. STRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 10.09% | 8.27% |
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 19.31% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGC and STRN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGC vs. STRN — Risk / Return Rank
MGC
STRN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MGC vs. STRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and SMART Trend ETF (STRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGC | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.43 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGC vs. STRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, which is greater than STRN's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and STRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGC | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.26% | -15.43% | -36.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -8.89% | +7.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -3.00% | -4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | — | — |
Volatility
MGC vs. STRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGC | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.18% | 26.85% | -13.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 26.85% | -9.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 26.85% | -8.63% |
MGC vs. STRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than STRN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGC vs. STRN - Dividend Comparison
MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than STRN's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 0.91% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGC and STRN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for STRN.
MGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.15% for STRN.
MGC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while STRN is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and SmartWay. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.59% for STRN.
Find the right allocation for MGC and STRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer