MGC vs. ITOT
MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MGC tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Index while ITOT tracks the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGC returned 16.36%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for ITOT. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MGC charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
MGC vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MGC having a 10.80% return and ITOT slightly higher at 11.25%. Over the past 10 years, MGC has outperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 16.36%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively lower 15.01% annualized return.
MGC
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.36%
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
MGC vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 10.80% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 29.77% | -19.95% | 27.58% | 21.57% | 31.14% | -3.45% | 22.61% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGC and ITOT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.98 |
The correlation between MGC and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGC vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGC
ITOT
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
MGC
ITOT
Communication Services
MGC
ITOT
Financial Services
MGC
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
MGC
ITOT
Healthcare
MGC
ITOT
Industrials
MGC
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
MGC
ITOT
Energy
MGC
ITOT
Basic Materials
MGC
ITOT
Utilities
MGC
ITOT
Real Estate
MGC
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGC vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
MGC
ITOT
MGC vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 3.17 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.61 | 14.57 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.32 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.74 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.82 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.57 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
MGC vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.93% | -55.20% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | -8.90% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -19.44% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -25.36% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.07% | -35.00% | +1.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -0.73% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -6.97% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 1.94% | +0.25% |
Volatility
MGC vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 3.04% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 2.99% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 9.13% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 12.20% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 17.36% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 18.26% | -0.05% |
MGC vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGC vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, MGC and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MGC has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -51.93% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 10-year performance, MGC leads with 16.36% vs 15.01% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGC has performed better with a 16.36% return vs 15.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGC.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.87% for MGC.
MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.03% for ITOT.
MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGC and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer