PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MGC vs. ACEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MGC vs. ACEP

Last updated Aug 6, 2026
Documentation

MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) and ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MGC is passively managed, while ACEP is actively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MGC charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACEP.

Performance

MGC vs. ACEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 12.89% return, which is significantly lower than ACEP's 24.65% return.

MGC

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.43%
6M
13.15%
YTD
12.89%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
16.09%
ALL TIME*
11.64%

ACEP

1D
0.02%
1M
2.51%
6M
15.44%
YTD
24.65%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

ACEP

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
$36.53K$36.84K$48.24K

MGC

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
$21.76M$23.42M$28.06M

MGC vs. ACEP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF		12.89%4.76%
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF		24.65%8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MGC and ACEP is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.74

MGC vs. ACEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MGC
ACEP

Technology

42.8%
34.3%

Communication Services

11.5%
1.2%

Financial Services

11.3%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
2.8%

Healthcare

9.2%
8.2%

Industrials

6.7%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
1.9%

Energy

2.2%
12.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%
11.1%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.6%

Utilities

0.8%

-

Technology

MGC
42.8%
ACEP
34.3%

Communication Services

MGC
11.5%
ACEP
1.2%

Financial Services

MGC
11.3%
ACEP
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

MGC
9.2%
ACEP
2.8%

Healthcare

MGC
9.2%
ACEP
8.2%

Industrials

MGC
6.7%
ACEP
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

MGC
4.4%
ACEP
1.9%

Energy

MGC
2.2%
ACEP
12.5%

Basic Materials

MGC
1.1%
ACEP
11.1%

Real Estate

MGC
0.9%
ACEP
1.6%

Utilities

MGC
0.8%
ACEP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF

Often compared with MGC:
MGC vs. MGKMGC vs. VOOMGC vs. MGVMGC vs. FGRTXMGC vs. QQQMGC vs. VOOGMGC vs. VONG
Often compared with ACEP:
ACEP vs. AFOSACEP vs. GXLCACEP vs. FNDBACEP vs. NRSHACEP vs. PSCXACEP vs. UJUNACEP vs. CNAV

Return for Risk

MGC vs. ACEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
ACEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGC vs. ACEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MGCACEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.82

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.52

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

—

—

MGC vs. ACEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGC vs. ACEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, which is greater than ACEP's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and ACEP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MGCACEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.26%

-7.06%

-45.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.28%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.44%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-1.74%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

—

—

Volatility

MGC vs. ACEP - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MGCACEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

16.86%

-3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

16.86%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

16.86%

+1.41%

MGC vs. ACEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ACEP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGC vs. ACEP - Dividend Comparison

MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than ACEP's 0.11% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF		0.11%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF		0.89%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

MGC and ACEP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACEP.

MGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.45% for ACEP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGC and ACEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer