PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACEP vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACEP vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACEP achieves a 23.46% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 36.79% return.


ACEP

1D
0.34%
1M
2.65%
YTD
23.46%
6M
22.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
0.72%
1M
8.55%
YTD
36.79%
6M
36.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACEP vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
23.46%8.00%
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
36.79%10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ACEP and AFOS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACEP vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACEP vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACEP vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACEP drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEP and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACEPAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-11.52%

+4.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

0.00%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-1.41%

-0.07%

Volatility

ACEP vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACEPAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.73%

21.17%

-3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

21.17%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

21.17%

-3.44%

ACEP vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ACEP and AFOS have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

ACEP vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

ACEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACEP and AFOS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACEP and AFOS have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACEP and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer