MGAFX vs. QBDSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MGAFX (Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio) and QBDSX (Quantified Managed Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, MGAFX returned 10.85%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for QBDSX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGAFX charges 0.48%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for QBDSX.

Performance

MGAFX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGAFX achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's 0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MGAFX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 10.85%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.81% annualized return.

MGAFX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: 11.19%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 24.18%
• 3Y*: 15.94%
• 5Y*: 9.34%
• 10Y*: 10.85%

QBDSX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 6M: -0.08%
• 1Y: 2.01%
• 3Y*: 3.03%
• 5Y*: 0.80%
• 10Y*: 0.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGAFX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGAFX Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio	11.19%	15.50%	11.51%	16.96%	-17.05%	24.51%	14.09%	24.08%	-6.55%	16.70%
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund	0.25%	5.11%	1.02%	2.25%	-4.09%	-0.66%	-9.22%	10.50%	-3.17%	5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between MGAFX and QBDSX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.43

Over the past year, MGAFX and QBDSX have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

MGAFX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGAFX

MGAFX Risk / Return Rank: 67
MGAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MGAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MGAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MGAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
MGAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

QBDSX

QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 7
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGAFX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MGAFX	QBDSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	0.56	+1.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	0.83	+2.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.10	+0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	0.65	+2.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.54	1.83	+11.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MGAFX vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGAFX and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MGAFX	QBDSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	0.56	+1.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.19	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.15	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.16	+0.53

Drawdowns

MGAFX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGAFX drawdown since its inception was -28.63%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGAFX and QBDSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGAFX	QBDSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.63%	-18.38%	-10.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.86%	-3.09%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.84%	-3.76%	-10.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.82%	-7.40%	-16.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.63%	-18.38%	-10.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.83%	+7.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.98%	-6.85%	+2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	1.10%	+0.72%

Volatility

MGAFX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.68%. This indicates that MGAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGAFX	QBDSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	0.68%	+2.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.13%	2.39%	+5.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.26%	3.59%	+6.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.54%	4.32%	+9.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.12%	5.25%	+8.87%

MGAFX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGAFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGAFX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

MGAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than QBDSX's 4.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGAFX Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio	4.02%	4.45%	3.36%	2.29%	3.02%	10.83%	4.87%	4.42%	6.15%	4.19%	3.50%	4.01%
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund	4.46%	4.47%	3.98%	4.51%	0.54%	0.71%	0.87%	2.26%	2.04%	2.51%	1.00%	3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGAFX and QBDSX in my portfolio?

MGAFX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGAFX or QBDSX?

MGAFX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to QBDSX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGAFX dropped -28.63% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.