PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGAFX vs. MMDEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGAFX vs. MMDEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX) and Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGAFX achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than MMDEX's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MGAFX has underperformed MMDEX with an annualized return of 10.46%, while MMDEX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.87% annualized return.


MGAFX

1D
1.44%
1M
-0.56%
6M
7.63%
YTD
10.46%
1Y
19.78%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
10.46%
ALL TIME*
9.31%

MMDEX

1D
2.25%
1M
-1.59%
6M
6.76%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
16.87%
ALL TIME*
12.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MGAFX vs. MMDEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGAFX
Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio
10.46%15.50%11.51%16.96%-17.05%24.51%14.09%24.08%-6.55%16.70%
MMDEX
Praxis Growth Index Fund
5.78%18.34%33.44%29.82%-28.23%28.12%33.23%39.87%0.32%26.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MGAFX and MMDEX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.89

The correlation between MGAFX and MMDEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGAFX vs. MMDEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGAFX
MGAFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MGAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MGAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MMDEX
MMDEX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MMDEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMDEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMDEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MMDEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMDEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGAFX vs. MMDEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX) and Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGAFXMMDEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.15

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

0.94

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.74

3.08

+6.66

MGAFX vs. MMDEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the MMDEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGAFX and MMDEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGAFX vs. MMDEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGAFX drawdown since its inception was -28.63%, smaller than the maximum MMDEX drawdown of -49.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGAFX and MMDEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGAFXMMDEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.63%

-49.99%

+21.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-15.73%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-23.16%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-33.36%

+9.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.63%

-33.36%

+4.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-5.70%

+4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-7.92%

+3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

4.79%

-2.92%

Volatility

MGAFX vs. MMDEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX) is 3.08%, while Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that MGAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMDEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGAFXMMDEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

5.08%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

13.95%

-4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

17.53%

-6.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.66%

21.15%

-7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.12%

20.67%

-6.55%

MGAFX vs. MMDEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGAFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than MMDEX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGAFX vs. MMDEX - Dividend Comparison

MGAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than MMDEX's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGAFX
Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio
4.04%4.45%3.36%2.29%3.02%10.83%4.87%4.42%6.15%4.19%3.50%4.01%
MMDEX
Praxis Growth Index Fund
4.43%4.69%1.65%2.02%5.77%1.42%6.66%12.23%5.03%3.42%1.08%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGAFX and MMDEX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMDEX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to MGAFX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGAFX dropped -28.63% vs MMDEX's -49.99%.

MGAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGAFX and MMDEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer