MGAFX vs. MVIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX) and Praxis Value Index Fund (MVIAX).
MGAFX is managed by Praxis Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 30, 2009. MVIAX is managed by Praxis Mutual Funds. It was launched on May 1, 2001.
Performance
MGAFX vs. MVIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGAFX vs. MVIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGAFX Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio | -1.01% | 15.50% | 11.51% | 16.96% | -17.05% | 24.51% | 14.09% | 24.08% | -6.55% | 16.70% |
MVIAX Praxis Value Index Fund | 2.60% | 12.97% | 10.24% | 20.04% | -7.89% | 24.54% | 3.56% | 34.46% | -8.53% | 16.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGAFX achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than MVIAX's 2.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MGAFX has underperformed MVIAX with an annualized return of 9.81%, while MVIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.
MGAFX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 15.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
MVIAX
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- 1Y
- 14.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.48%
- 5Y*
- 9.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGAFX vs. MVIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGAFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than MVIAX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGAFX vs. MVIAX — Risk / Return Rank
MGAFX
MVIAX
MGAFX vs. MVIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX) and Praxis Value Index Fund (MVIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGAFX | MVIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.93 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.36 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.29 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | 5.97 | +1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGAFX | MVIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.93 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.68 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.69 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.32 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGAFX and MVIAX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGAFX vs. MVIAX - Dividend Comparison
MGAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than MVIAX's 1.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGAFX Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio | 4.48% | 4.45% | 3.36% | 2.29% | 3.02% | 10.83% | 4.87% | 4.42% | 6.15% | 4.19% | 3.50% | 4.01% |
MVIAX Praxis Value Index Fund | 1.03% | 1.06% | 9.59% | 4.63% | 5.11% | 3.63% | 8.55% | 4.84% | 7.28% | 6.40% | 2.63% | 5.10% |
Drawdowns
MGAFX vs. MVIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGAFX drawdown since its inception was -28.63%, smaller than the maximum MVIAX drawdown of -65.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGAFX and MVIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGAFX | MVIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.63% | -65.34% | +36.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -11.66% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.82% | -18.89% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.63% | -36.03% | +7.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.78% | -4.78% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -12.18% | +8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.52% | -0.32% |
Volatility
MGAFX vs. MVIAX - Volatility Comparison
Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Praxis Value Index Fund (MVIAX) at 3.84%. This indicates that MGAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGAFX | MVIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 3.84% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 7.51% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.63% | 14.91% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 14.23% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 16.81% | -2.72% |