MFVL vs. SEIV
MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and SEIV (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFVL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.
Performance
MFVL vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 18.28% return.
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEIV
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 10.69%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 6M
- 21.23%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 27.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 18.28% | 1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFVL and SEIV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFVL vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank
MFVL
SEIV
MFVL vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFVL | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.23 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
MFVL vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and SEIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFVL | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -18.18% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -0.85% | -2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -3.48% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.70% | — |
Volatility
MFVL vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFVL | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 12.49% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 16.68% | -4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 16.68% | -4.53% |
MFVL vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFVL vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison
MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 1.34% | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFVL and SEIV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.
SEIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.15% for SEIV.
Find the right allocation for MFVL and SEIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer