MFVL vs. MVAL
MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and MVAL (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. MFVL is actively managed, while MVAL is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFVL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MVAL.
Performance
MFVL vs. MVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than MVAL's -2.29% return.
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVAL
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 13.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL vs. MVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | -2.29% | 1.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFVL and MVAL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFVL vs. MVAL — Risk / Return Rank
MFVL
MVAL
MFVL vs. MVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFVL | MVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.53 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
MFVL vs. MVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum MVAL drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and MVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFVL | MVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -19.56% | +12.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -10.57% | +7.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -3.78% | +1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.88% | — |
Volatility
MFVL vs. MVAL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFVL | MVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 13.73% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 15.40% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 15.40% | -3.25% |
MFVL vs. MVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MVAL's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFVL vs. MVAL - Dividend Comparison
MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | 1.79% | 1.75% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFVL and MVAL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MVAL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MVAL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.
MVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.49% for MVAL.
Find the right allocation for MFVL and MVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer